Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
A third edition of the PRINCIPIA appeared in 1726, with many changes
and additions. About four years were consumed in its preparation
and publication, which were under the superintendence of Dr. Henry
Pemberton, an accomplished mathematician, and the author of "A VIEW OF
SIR ISAAC NEWTON'S PHILOSOPHY," 1728. This gentleman enjoyed numerous
opportunities of conversing with the aged and illustrious author. "I
found," says Pemberton, "he had read fewer of the modern mathematicians
than one could have expected; but his own prodigious invention readily
supplied him with what he might have an occasion for in the pursuit
of any subject he undertook. I have often[Pg 57] heard him censure the
handling geometrical subjects by algebraic calculations; and his book
of Algebra he called by the name of Universal Arithmetic, in opposition
to the injudicious title of Geometry, which Descartes had given to the
treatise, wherein he shows how the geometer may assist his invention
by such kind of computations. He thought Huygens the most elegant of
any mathematical writer of modern times, and the most just imitator
of the ancients. Of their taste and form of demonstration, Sir Isaac
always professed himself a great admirer. I have heard him even censure
himself for not following them yet more closely than he did; and
speak with regret of his mistake at the beginning of his mathematical
studies, in applying himself to the works of Descartes and other
algebraic writers, before he had considered the elements of Euclid with
that attention which so excellent a writer deserves."
"Though his memory was much decayed," continues Dr. Pemberton, "he
perfectly understood his own writings." And even this failure of
memory, we would suggest, might have been more apparent than real, or,
in medical terms, more the result of functional weakness than organic
decay. Newton seems never to have confided largely to his memory: and
as this faculty manifests the most susceptibility to cultivation; so,
in the neglect of due exercise, it more readily and plainly shows a
diminution of its powers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account