Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophyNewton, Isaac
General
Newton's Principia : $b The mathematical principles of natural philosophy
Newton, Isaac
Celestial mechanics -- Early works to 1800; Mechanics -- Early works to 1800
SINCE the ancients (as we are told by Pappus), made great
account of the science of mechanics in the investigation of natural
things; and the moderns, laying aside substantial forms and occult
qualities, have endeavoured to subject the phænomena of nature to the
laws of mathematics, I have in this treatise cultivated mathematics
so far as it regards philosophy. The ancients considered mechanics
in a twofold respect; as rational, which proceeds accurately by
demonstration; and practical. To practical mechanics all the manual
arts belong, from which mechanics took its name. But as artificers
do not work with perfect accuracy, it comes to pass that mechanics
is so distinguished from geometry, that what is perfectly accurate
is called geometrical; what is less so, is called mechanical. But
the errors are not in the art, but in the artificers. He that works
with less accuracy is an imperfect mechanic; and if any could work
with perfect accuracy, he would be the most perfect mechanic of all;
for the description of right lines and circles, upon which geometry
is founded, belongs to mechanics. Geometry does not teach us to draw
these lines, but requires them to be drawn; for it requires that the
learner should first be taught to describe these accurately, before he
enters upon geometry; then it shows how by these operations problems
may be solved. To describe right lines and circles are problems, but
not geometrical problems. The solution of these problems is required
from mechanics; and by geometry the use of them, when so solved, is
shown; and it is the glory of geometry that from those few principles,
brought from without, it is able to produce so many things. Therefore
geometry is founded in mechanical practice, and is nothing but that
part of universal mechanics which accurately proposes and demonstrates
the art of measuring. But since the manual arts are chiefly conversant
in the moving of bodies, it comes to pass that geometry is commonly
referred to their magnitudes, and mechanics to their motion. In this
sense rational mechanics will be the science of motions resulting
from any forces whatsoever, and of the forces required to produce any
motions, accurately proposed and demonstrated. This part of mechanics
was[Pg lxviii] cultivated by the ancients in the five powers which relate to
manual arts who considered gravity (it not being a manual power),
no otherwise than as it moved weights by those powers. Our design
not respecting arts, but philosophy, and our subject not manual but
natural powers, we consider chiefly those things which relate to
gravity, levity, elastic force, the resistance of fluids, and the
like forces, whether attractive or impulsive; and therefore we offer
this work as the mathematical principles of philosophy; for all the
difficulty of philosophy seems to consist in this—from the phænomena
of motions to investigate the forces of nature, and then from these
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account