Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
History
Niebuhr's lectures on Roman history, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Niebuhr, Barthold Georg
Rome -- History
There must now have been something which led the Belgians to dread that
Cæsar would attack them: from his Commentaries, it appears as if the
Gallic peoples had always been mistrustful and ill-disposed, without any
reason at all. All the Belgians between the Seine, the Marne, and the
Rhine, with the exception of the Remi—who were the most distinguished
among them—were arrayed in arms against the Romans. I suppose that the
Remi intrigued with these last, that they might thus get the other
Belgian tribes under their clientship. The weakness of the Gallic and
Belgian nations lay in their not having a free population: they had only
priests (Druids), knights, and serfs. These last on many occasions could
not forget that they were fighting only for their masters, and not for
their country, although they often indeed behaved bravely;—sometimes
they even fought with the courage of lions, but there was no
steadfastness in it. Of a people like the Nervians, one might almost
surmise that they had no serfs. This Belgian war Cæsar decided in two
battles, on the Aisne and on the Sombre; whereupon he invaded Brabant,
then the country of the Nervians. They stood their ground most nobly,
but yet they were almost entirely exterminated.
The Æduans and the Arvernians now silently acknowledged the supremacy of
the Romans; and most of the peoples of Gaul, as far as the Ocean, were
completely subdued. Cæsar was already spreading his troops in extensive
winter-quarters among the Belgians, from whom he expected to meet with a
stouter resistance. Thus he got into collision with the Germans, the
Usipetes and the Tenchteri, having crossed the Rhine, and made war
against the Belgians on the Meuse. Ever ready to take advantage of such
an opportunity, he fell upon them; and here he committed the worst act
of his life. Having entered into negotiations with these tribes, he got
their chiefs to come to him, threw them into prison, and then attacked
the host which he had thus deprived of its leaders—a base deed which he
tries in vain to justify. This business was brought before the senate.
Cato was for having Cæsar given up to the Germans as one who had broken
the law of nations, a motion which of course came to nothing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account