[125] “Incredibile vulgi apud Germanos, & maxime (quod
pudet dicere) Catholicos superstitio, invidia, calumniæ,
detractationes, susurrationes & similia, quæ nec
Magistratus punit, nee concionatores arguunt, suspicionem
magiæ primum excitant. Omnes divinaæ punitiones, quas
in sacris literis Deus minatus est, à Sagis sunt. Nihil
jam amplius Deus facit aut natura, sed Sagæ omnia. 2.
Unde impetu omnes clamant ut igitur inquirat Magistratus
in Sagas, quas non nisi ipsi suis linguis tot fecerunt”
(Cautio Criminalis, seu de Processibus contra Sagas Liber,
2d ed., 1695, pp. 387-388; cf. Dubium xv, pp. 67-68, Dubium
xxxiv, pp. 231-232). Spee’s book came out anonymously in
1631, and, unlike most works on this side of the question,
had immediate results. Spee had no doubt of the existence
of witchcraft (Dubium i, pp. 1 ff., Dubium iii, pp. 7-8);
his experience, however, had taught him that most of those
condemned were innocent.
[126] The case is reported in A True and Impartial Relation
of the Informations against Three Witches [etc.], 1682,
which is reprinted in Howell’s State Trials, VIII, 1017 ff.
[127] Autobiography, chap. x, ed. Jessopp, 1887, pp.
131-132. North gives a similar account of the same trial,
with some general observations of great interest, in his
Life of the Lord Keeper Guilford, I, 267-269 (ed. 1826). It
is not clear whether North was present at the trial or not.
It is important to notice that North wrote his biographies
late in life and that his death did not take place until
1736, the year in which the statute against witchcraft was
repealed.
[128] North remarks that Guilford (then Francis North,
Chief Justice of the Common Pleas) “had really a concern
upon him at what happened; which was, that his brother
Raymond’s passive behavior should let those poor women die”
(Life of the Lord Keeper Guilford, I, 267). Raymond was, to
be sure, the judge who presided at the trial, but Francis
North cannot be allowed to have all the credit which his
brother Roger would give him, for he refused to reprieve
the convicted witches (see his letter, quoted at p. 34,
above).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account