As in duty bound, upon his accession to the throne of his ancestors, a loyal congratulatory address was voted by the members of the University of Cambridge in full senate. This was shortly afterwards presented to his Majesty at St. James's Palace by the then Vice-Chancellor, Dr. George Thackery, D.D., Provost of King's College, at the head of a large body of the heads of colleges, and others, _en robe_. His majesty not only received it most graciously, but with that truly English expression that goes home to the bosom of every Briton, told Dr. Thackery he "should shortly take pot-luck with him in Cambridge." The term, too, is worthy of particular notice, since it expresses his Majesty's kind consideration for the contents of the university chest, and the pockets of its members. Oxford, it is well known, is still _smarting_ under the heavy charges incident upon the memorable visit of his late Majesty, George the Fourth, in 1814, with the Emperor Alexander and the King of Prussia and their _suites_. It would be no drawback upon the popularity of princes if they did take "_pot-luck_" with their subjects oftener than they do. Let there be no drawback upon hospitality, but let the "feast of reason and the flow of soul" suffice for the _costly banquet_. In olden times, our monarchs _took pot-luck_ both at Oxford, Cambridge, and elsewhere, without their subjects being the less loyal. Queen Elizabeth and James the First and Second were frequent visitors at both those seats of learning. Elizabeth, indeed, that flower of British monarchs, suffered no designing minister to shake her confidence in her people's loyalty. She did not confine her movements to the dull routine of two or three royal palaces,--her palace was her empire. She went about "doing good" by the light of her countenance. She, and not her _minister_, was the people's _idol_. I therefore come to the conclusion, that the expressed determination of his majesty, William the Fourth, to take _pot-luck_ with his good people of the University of Cambridge, is the dawn of a return of those wholesome practices of which we read in the works of our ANNALISTS, when "'Twas merry in the hall, And their beards wagged all." Wood relates, amongst other humorous incidents, that DURING QUEEN ELIZABETH'S SECOND VISIT TO OXFORD,