Obesity, or Excessive Corpulence: The Various Causes and the Rational Means of CureDancel, J.-F. (Jean-François)
Science
Obesity, or Excessive Corpulence: The Various Causes and the Rational Means of Cure
Dancel, J.-F. (Jean-François)
Obesity; Weight loss
Physicians who have derived their knowledge from books, and from the
lectures of their teachers, must find it difficult to change their
opinions in reference to obesity. With the public, when any one is
told that the imbibition of large quantities of water is productive
of fat, and that feeding upon animal food induces leanness, a similar
degree of doubt is excited as when Galileo asserted that the sun did
not revolve around the earth. On the publication of the first edition
of my treatise upon Obesity, I experienced a degree of impatience,
and even irritation, in view of the systematic opposition which a
self-evident truth received at the hands of the medical profession. At
the present time, however, I calmly recognize that the same happened
in the case of every attempted innovation. I call to mind how Galileo
endangered his very existence. Vesalius, the founder of anatomy,
was saved from the stake only by the interference of his sovereign.
Harvey, the discoverer of the circulation, was compelled to seek royal
protection from the attacks of the medical men of his day. Peysonnel,
a physician of Marseilles, and a great naturalist, devoted himself
to the study of corals and madrepores. In 1727, he laid before the
Academy of Science a monogram, proving to demonstration that corals and
madrepores are structures due to animal life; that what Dioscorides,
Pliny, Linnæus, Lamarck, Tournefort, &c. &c. had thought to be flowers,
are in truth animals; and that these living creatures constructed
and augmented their abodes; the Academy, like most learned bodies,
admitted as truth only that which it taught, and consequently paid no
attention to this memoir, which, nevertheless, was destined to produce
an entire change in a large department of natural history. When, long
afterwards, Trembley published his discoveries on fresh-water polypes,
the studies of Dr. Peysonnel in this direction were remembered, and
naturalists were forced to admit that the physician of Marseilles
was right in maintaining that what had been taken for flowers are
in reality animals. His claim as the discoverer of a fact which was
destined to effect an important revolution in an extensive department
of natural history, has since then not been disputed, nor could it be.
All men, and men of science especially, require time before yielding to
evidence, when that evidence is in opposition to preconceived views,
and interferes with personal interest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account