Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal DiseaseDuncan, Andrew
History
Observations on the Operation and Use of Mercury in the Venereal Disease
Duncan, Andrew
Mercury -- Therapeutic use -- Early works to 1800; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Early works to 1800
But, although it is necessary to say little with regard to temperaments
obviously distinguishable; yet it is well known, that very great
varieties in the operation of mercury arise from peculiarities in
constitution. And this happens where there are no particular marks
indicating such a singularity. Some constitutions are affected by
mercury with very great ease, whether as acting on the alimentary canal,
or as entering the system, and exerting its effects there. In cases,
therefore, where the constitution of the patient is not previously
known, some degree of preference is, on this account, due to the mildest
forms. And, in those cases for which the more acrid ones seem best
fitted, it is necessary to begin with the employment of small doses;
and, if the action of these shall be found to be too violent, to have
recourse to the different means of taking off sensibility. The most
immediate, and perhaps the most effectual, means of removing or
diminishing sensibility, is by the use of opium. But the same end may,
in many cases, be obtained with equal ease, and less hazard, from the
use of emollient and mild diluents; such as decoctions and emulsions,
abounding with vegetable mucilage.
While some constitutions are easily affected by mercury, others, on the
contrary, are acted upon with difficulty only. With these last, after
the use of even a very considerable quantity of mercury, little, or
perhaps no obvious action on the system can be observed. This is to be
ascribed to one of two causes; either it arises from the mercury’s never
having entered the system; or from its being accumulated there without
proving a stimulus to any secretion. In the latter of these cases, all
the effects wanted from the use of mercury may be obtained with greater
ease than in any other.
The only thing, then, which is necessary in such cases is to proceed
with caution, and not to throw into the system an unnecessary quantity
of mercury, by which the patient may be exposed to those inconveniencies
which, in a greater or less degree, accompany every increased excretion.
But it is not always an easy matter to distinguish betwixt this and the
case first mentioned, in which it was alledged, that the want of obvious
action arose from the mercury’s not having entered the system. When this
happens, a gradual and slow procedure would not only be losing time to
the patient, but allowing the disease to gain ground. The only certain
mark for distinguishing betwixt these two cases, is the change produced
in the morbid symptoms. In the one, the disease remains either unaltered
or increased; in the other, all the symptoms are manifestly changed for
the better.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account