their minds and in the proportion in which these are opened the man
becomes more and more a man.”
Swedenborg has some very beautiful observations with regard to the
rejuvenescence of those who have passed into the higher life. “All who
come into heaven,” he says, “return into their vernal youth, and remain
so to eternity. The more thousands of years they live the more beautiful
and happy is the spring to which they attain.... In a word, to grow old
in heaven is to grow young.... They who live in the chaste life of
marriage are above all others in the order and form of Heaven after
death. Their beauty, therefore, is surpassing, and the flower of their
youth endures for ever.”
What are we to say of this man who propounded this amazing gospel as a
direct message from the highest spheres? What are we to say of his
communications and conversations with the unseen world? Of his _bona
fides_ it is impossible to entertain a doubt. The ordinary hypothesis is
that he suffered from hallucinations. It has been argued on the other
hand, that for a man so sane and so shrewd in the ordinary affairs of
the world, hallucinations of the kind were an impossibility. This,
however, seems going rather too far. Some of the sanest men in the world
have had special points on which they were not mentally sound. Monomania
is a recognised form of mental aberration, and the man who suffers from
it is as sane as his fellows on all matters except one.
This spiritual communion, however, was continuous in the case of
Swedenborg for many years, and during those years occupied either in
itself or in the activities that arose from it the larger portion of his
life. In spite of this absorption, his relations with his fellow men
continued as sane and responsible as those of any of his neighbours.
Would this have been possible, one may ask, in the face of so absorbing
an interest, had this interest merely been founded on a monomania? It
would, I think, be difficult to parallel such a case. If, however, we
decide to take Swedenborg’s relations with the other world at his own
valuation, are we called upon to accept his gospel at his own valuation
on that account? Certainly I think not. Swedenborg’s estimate of the
status of the spiritual beings with whom he communicated, even if we
accept their reality, need not be ours. Recent investigations and
records of innumerable psychic experiences have tended to show what a
miscellaneous crowd of spirits hover around the confines of this
material world. Swedenborg’s mistake has been made by many spiritualists
of the present day, and sometimes with disastrous results. Swedenborg
had not before him the evidence which we now hold to warn him of the
necessity of testing the quality of his spiritual communicants. The
experiences encountered overwhelmed him by their unexpected and
apparently miraculous character, and his naturally sane judgment was at
fault for want of a criterion by which to estimate them.[12] Few of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account