(_Exit Meadows_)
COUNTESS T.: So sorry to be late, my dear Lady Eaveston. It was
charmingly tolerant of you to have us.
LADY E.: Invitations are never tolerant, my dear Countess; acceptances
always are. But do tell me, how is your husband, the Count,--or
perhaps he is no longer your husband. One never knows these days
whether a man is his wife's husband or whether she is simply his wife.
COUNTESS T. (_lighting a cigarette_): Really, Lady Eaveston, you grow
more and more interesting. I detest interesting people; they are so
hopelessly uninteresting. It is like beautiful people--who are usually
so singularly unbeautiful. Has not that been your experience, Sir
Mortimer?
SIR M.: May I have the pleasure of escorting you to the music-room,
Mrs. Wrennington?
(_Exeunt omnes to music-room for dinner_)
Curtain.
It is from this that we have, in a measure, been delivered by the
court-room scenes, and all the medical dramas. But the paradox still
remains intrenched in English writing behind Mr. G.K. Chesterton, and
he may be considered, by literary tacticians, as considerable
stronghold.
Here again we find our commonplaces shaken up until they emerge in
what looks like a new and tremendously imposing shape, and all of them
ostensibly proving the opposite of what we have always understood. If
we do not quite catch the precise meaning at first reading, we lay it
to our imperfect perception and try to do better on the next one. It
seldom occurs to us that it really may have no meaning at all and
never was intended to have any, any more than the act of hanging by
your feet from parallel bars has any further significance than that
you can manage to do it.
So, before retiring to the privacy of our personal couches, let us
thank an all wise Providence, that the drama-paradox has passed away.
XVIII
SHAKESPEARE EXPLAINED
_Carrying on the System of Footnotes to a Silly Extreme_
PERICLES
ACT II. SCENE 3
_Enter first Lady-in-Waiting_ (_Flourish_,^1 _Hautboys_^2 _and_^3
_torches_^4).
_First Lady-in-Waiting_--What^5 ho!^6 Where^7 is^8 the^9 music?^10
NOTES
1. _Flourish_: The stage direction here is obscure. Clarke claims it
should read "flarish," thus changing the meaning of the passage to
"flarish" (that is, the King's), but most authorities have agreed that
it should remain "flourish," supplying the predicate which is to be
flourished. There was at this time a custom in the countryside of
England to flourish a mop as a signal to the passing vender of
berries, signifying that in that particular household there was a
consumer-demand for berries, and this may have been meant in this
instance. That Shakespeare was cognizant of this custom of flourishing
the mop for berries is shown in a similar passage in the second part
of King Henry IV, where he has the Third Page enter and say,
"Flourish." Cf. also Hamlet, IV, 7:4.
[Illustration: "Might be one of the hautboys bearing a box of
"trognies" for the actors to suck."]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account