Oliver Constable, miller and baker, Vol. 1 (of 3)Tytler, Sarah
Philosophy
Oliver Constable, miller and baker, Vol. 1 (of 3)
Tytler, Sarah
England -- Social conditions -- 19th century -- Fiction
This was one of the instances of natural antipathy and comparatively
causeless dislike, which, like the opposite examples of instinctive
partiality, and hardly warranted attachment, were apt to hold sway
over Fan Constable’s ardent, concentrated temperament. Hers was not
an unjust or undisciplined character, while it was loyal to the core;
but it was full of ‘likes and dislikes.’ There was nothing lymphatic
or volatile about Fan, to her great loss of ease and tranquillity. If
she had been put under an examination as to the provocation she had
received from Mrs. Hilliard, who was Fan’s remote kinswoman and early
patroness, Fan could not have given any save the pettiest reasons of
which she herself would have been the first to feel ashamed. Yet her
asperity where this woman was concerned amounted to rancour. Sometimes
the sentiment in her own bosom struck Fan as unchristian, and being
very sincere in her Christianity, she sought to qualify her enmity by
solemnly assuring herself of what was the truth—that she would not
injure Louisa Hilliard for the world. It was only incidentally that
Catherine Hilliard came in for her share of the dislike which Fan had
to Catherine’s cousin. The two younger women possessed nothing in
common, but neither had they any sharp points of antagonism. If it had
not been for Fan Constable’s extraordinary aversion to Mrs. Hilliard,
Fan would have viewed Catherine Hilliard with simple indifference.
Mrs. Hilliard and her cousin kept house together, chiefly upon Mrs.
Hilliard’s income, at the ‘Meadows,’ which was at once the largest,
and, though it sounds a contradiction, the cosiest, certainly the
prettiest, of the villas which had sprung up on the outskirts of
Friarton. The ‘Meadows,’ in fact, was more of a small country house
than a villa. It entitled its occupant, unless she were a very
objectionable person otherwise, to revolve in the first of the social
circles—which, like the sap-rings in the trunk of a tree, divided the
townspeople into various grades of enclosure. Nay, the ‘Meadows’
entitled its owner to hover on the verge, which she crossed not
infrequently, of the county families.
For Mrs. Hilliard was only objectionable in possessing a carelessness
of mind—a rather pronounced Bohemianism. She was regardless of who
took her up or who let her down, which had an effect the reverse
of what some people might have expected. As she was also a lively
agreeable woman, superficially refined, a well-endowed, comely widow
of thirty-five years of age, who relished her freedom too keenly to
have any thought of marrying again, but who kept a pleasant house and
welcomed her friends to it, she was lifted clean above the ebb and
flow of social fickleness; she was landed in established popularity
with _carte blanche_ to do very much as she pleased, and fill up her
visiting-list just as she chose.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account