Cromwell’s exertions had been so severe that he could not follow the
flying Royalists with his usual rapidity. The army had been long without
pay; they had not a penny with which to get their horses shod, and so
many horses had been slain and were lamed or done out that a large
number of the troopers were on foot, and the others could hardly spur
their jaded mounts into a trot. Munro was not only a ruthless plunderer,
but a hard fighter, and on his arrival in Scotland Argyle felt doubtful
as to his capacity to cope with him, and sent to Cromwell for
assistance. Cromwell promptly invaded Scotland, being careful to pose as
the ally of Argyle and the Kirk, and therefore the true friend of the
Scottish nation. According to his custom, he rigorously suppressed
plundering. All resistance withered away before him. He was received at
Edinburgh as a powerful and honored ally, and before he recrossed the
border the Scotch were again avowed supporters, for the time being at
least, of the Parliament.
The enemy in arms had been defeated. It remained to deal with the
Parliament and the Presbyterian party. Some had been active for the
King; most had been lukewarm; the victory had been a victory for the
army, and therefore for the Independents. Neither Cromwell nor the army
was of a temper to refrain from finishing matters. Before the struggle
was decided Cromwell had written Fairfax: “I pray God teach this nation
and those that are over us ... what the mind of God may be in all this,
and what our duty is. Surely it is not that the poor, godly people of
this Kingdom should still be made the object of wrath and anger, nor
that our God would have our necks under a yoke of bondage. For these
things that have lately come to pass have been the wonderful works of
God, breaking the rod of the oppressor.”
He was not in the least a doctrinaire Republican or Parliamentarian; he
believed as little in the divine right of majorities as in the divine
right of kings. Neither would he have admitted such a right as existing
in an army, or, as yet, in himself. But it was impossible to stand
still. He had to act with some party, though with none was he in entire
accord; for one was hostile, another hopelessly undecided, the third
prone to extreme measures and representing only a minority in the
nation. He could only act with the last, and yet this meant an overturn
of the recognized governmental authorities. Whether he would or not, he
had to proceed along the path of revolution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account