Art criticism; Dramatic criticism; Literature -- History and criticism
Mr. Robins, who has filled his pages with the stories of the plot of
a few of her pieces and with extracts from two or three comedies in
which she was presumably most brilliant, would have made his book
perhaps not more generally engaging, but more instructive, had he
printed from Mr. Joseph Knight’s scholarly record in the _Dictionary
of National Biography_ the immense list of her _rôles_. He does, of
course, speak incidentally at least of the actress’s range; but nothing
convinces one of it quite so surely as the scanning of that record of
her honourable labour. So far as one can tell, she must have been about
at her best in _The Provoked Husband_; but, did she play Andromache or
even Sophonisba, she got from each the maximum of its effect. Though
poor originally, she was of gentle blood, and perhaps she played best,
with her poetic realism, the parts of ladies of her day. Over a spell
of twenty years, her art--like Ellen Terry’s and Mrs. Kendal’s in our
own time--knew no decay. Like Aimée Desclée, she acted at the last in
presence of great physical suffering. When she died the Town grieved
‘sincerely’; and though, with curious English compromise, she was
refused a monument, she was not forbidden to be buried in the great
grey Abbey whose walls rise cliff-like over against the street in which
she passed her childhood. It is a pity that her story has been told
by Mr. Robins with so naïve an absence of anything approaching style.
She was a theme for a writer. But the amiable book-maker and genuinely
interested student of her craft and period who is responsible for the
various prolixity of this volume must be forgiven much because he has
loved much. He tells us, it is true, by way of permissible yet not
wholly praiseworthy padding, much more about her contemporaries in
her palmy days, and in her days not palmy, than about herself. Mrs.
Oldfield meanders, like a thin stream, through a meadow of Queen Anne
and early Georgian gossip. We do not resent the gossip. If it is not
authentic information, it is readable chatter. Would only that it were
easier to disengage from the mass of it the delightful and enlivening
and kindling personality of Mrs. Oldfield!
(_Literature_, 22nd October 1898.)
SIDDONS AND RACHEL
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account