Again, it has been already pointed out that it is desirable to complete
the operation on the lip simultaneously with the reposition of the
median projection; the effect of this more serious step is manifestly to
increase the shock to the little patient, who is probably not in the most
vigorous condition of health from its inability to take nutriment in the
usual way, and at any rate renders the occurrence of primary union less
likely. This fact may perhaps explain the much higher death-rate after
operation amongst German surgeons than in this country. The prominent
condition of the under lip (Fig. 75, p. 147) can be remedied later on
by excising a 𝖵-shaped portion from its centre, resulting in marked
improvement to the facial expression, especially in patients operated on
after infancy.
To my own mind the disadvantages of the retention of the incisive bone so
clearly outweigh the _prima-facie_ advantages, that in my practice I have
followed the usual course adopted by the majority of British surgeons
in removing the bone at the earliest opportunity. By this removal the
operation on the lip can be more successfully accomplished, and as
regards the profile effect the later introduction of a dental plate with
artificial incisors will greatly improve the appearance, and enable the
patient to bite in a satisfactory manner, far more so, in fact, than with
the mobile os incisivum.
After removal of the bone and union of the lip, the approximation of
the maxillæ to one another has been repeatedly observed and accurately
noted. Whether this is due to the insensible pressure of the united
lip or to increased osseous development is a matter of but slight
importance; probably both agents contribute to this desirable effect.
If, however, the maxillæ are considerably drawn together, the “bite” or
dental adjustment between the upper and lower jaws becomes uneven, _i.
e._ the upper teeth fall within the lower so that during mastication,
side-to-side movements of the mandible, as seen in horses and cows,
become needful.
After the child has recovered from this preliminary operation of
extirpation of the incisive bone, and the raw surface left by its
removal has cicatrised, the soft parts of the lip are then dealt with.
This cannot be well undertaken before the tenth to the fourteenth day.
The operation, so far as the lateral segments are concerned, should be
carried out according to the principles enunciated for the single harelip
operation. A free detachment of the lip from the maxillæ by undercutting
should be the first step, and this must be accomplished thoroughly
in these bilateral cases. The edges will then require preparation by
curved incisions made from above downwards as far as the muco-cutaneous
junction, and then prolabial flaps are formed by cutting upwards and
inwards at an angle of 60° to the preceding (Fig. 54 A).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account