On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second seriesIrons, William J. (William Josiah)
Religion
On the apostolical succession: Parochial lectures, second series
Irons, William J. (William Josiah)
Apostolic succession -- Sermons; Church of England -- Sermons; Sermons, English
It was indeed a mighty system rising throughout the world, and reduced by
slow degrees to regularity and form. But two points seem settled and
clear from the very first,—the necessity of Baptism to membership in the
Community, and the necessity of the Apostles’ sanction to _every_ thing
in the Community Universal. {123} And these two points being as clear
and undeniable as any can possibly be, they simplify and make plain many
of the supposed difficulties of that unformed state of things, which must
have presented itself first of all in the Christian societies.
Supposing, for instance, it were even made quite clear, that any
Christian man, at first, was permitted to administer Baptism (though
there really is no proof of this, but, on the contrary, a great deal
against it), yet, knowing, as we do for certain, the Supremacy of the
Apostles, we may be sure that no such thing would have been practised
without their temporary sanction. The same Apostles who gave Deacons a
portion of their power, to “minister to the necessities of saints,” might
if they thought fit have given to other Christians, permission to
Baptize, in their absence. And this might be more readily accorded to
those private Christians who had, as so many had, supernatural gifts.
But it took, and plainly must have taken, many years to reduce to uniform
order so far spread and rapidly-risen a system as that of the Christian
Church. It would take time to ascertain in remote parts the will of the
Apostles; and in the interim, doubtless, many confusions would naturally
arise, especially in those scarcely-formed Communities which perhaps had
no settled Elders or Deacons, much less Bishops. Since, then, the
principle is clear, that every Baptized man was held to be a subject of
the Apostles’ dominion, i.e. the “kingdom of heaven” or Church, it is
plain, that the validity of any act of a ministerial kind would be
derived from the Apostolical permission. And it is on this principle,
and this alone, that Lay-Baptism can be said to have had any Primitive
sanction. In so far as the Apostle, and afterwards the Bishop, might
allow it, it might have a _pro tanto_ validity; and so the Bishop was
deemed to complete Baptism by laying on his hands in Confirmation. (Acts
viii. 17) Such is the language of the early Fathers, not only with
respect to Baptism, but every other matter; as for instance, Marriage,
which could not be sanctified by Roman Registrars had such existed, but
was reckoned base and unchristian unless it had the Bishop’s sanction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account