British -- France -- Fiction; France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Fiction; Historical fiction
But what, in heaven’s name, induced this man to a mutinous attitude
towards a social system of which, by reason of his position, he need
take nothing but profit? His opportunities of selfish gratification
would not be multiplied by the sacrifice of caste and fortune. He was
not, Ned felt convinced, a reformer by conviction. Unless the itch for
cheap notoriety was the tap-root of his character, what was to account
for this astonishing paradox?
What, indeed? Yet a motiveless losel is no uncommon sight. To be born
with a silver spoon in one’s mouth is to be endowed with what it is
obviously difficult to retain. It is to be awarded the prize before
the race is run, and that is no encouragement to sound morality or
healthy effort. Easily acquired is soon dissipated. What wonder, then,
if Fortunatus, shedding wealth as naturally as he sheds his
milk-teeth, looks to Nature for a renewal of all in kind.
“Well,” said St Denys, “you are going to Paris. It is the beacon-light
about which the storm birds circle. If you seek experience, you will
there gain it; if novelty--_mon Dieu_!--you will have the opportunity
to see some strange puppets dance by-and-by.”
“And doubtless those who would hold the strings are in the clouds.”
“Not so, monsieur. These marionettes--they will move on a different
principle, by trackers, like an organ. It may even be possible to make
one or two skip, touching a note here in this quiet corner of Liége.
But I do not know. When the time comes for the performance, this
puppet-man himself may be in Paris.”
“You allude to M. de St Denys?”
“Do I? But, after all, he is very small beer.”
Nicette sang like a bee in a flower. Her cot was the veritable
summer-house to a garden-village--luxuriously cool as an
evening-primrose blossom with a ladybird and a crystal of dew in the
heart of it. She was always self-contained, always tranquil, always
fragrant. Her reputation, like that of some other saints, was founded,
perhaps, upon her constitutional insensibility to small irritations.
Cause and effect in her were temperament and digestion--read either
way--influencing one another serenely. That sensitiveness of the moral
cuticle that, with the most of us, finds intentional aggravations in
habits and opinions that are not ours, she would appear to be innocent
of. She never complained of nail-points in her shoes or crumbs in her
bed; and that was to be bird of rare enough feather to merit
distinction. Indifference to pain is considered none the less
worshipful because it proceeds from insusceptibility to it: the name
of sanctity may attach itself to the most self-enjoying impassibility.
The moral is objective; for how many dyspeptics--sufferers--are there,
turning an habitual brave face to their colourless world, who would be
other than damned incontinent by a whole posse of devil’s-advocates
were a claim advanced to dub them so much as Blessed?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account