Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume IIHippolytus, Antipope
Philosophy
Philosophumena; or, The refutation of all heresies, Volume II
Hippolytus, Antipope
Christian heresies -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Occultism; Philosophy, Ancient
[Footnote 114: Βυθὸς καὶ Μίξις, Ἀγήρατος καὶ Ἕνωσις, Αὐτοφυὴς καὶ
Ἡδονή, Ἀκίνητος καὶ Σύγκρασις, Μονογενὴς καὶ Μακαρία. For the first
name Irenæus (I, i. 1, p. 11, Harvey), has Bythios, thereby making the
substantive into an adjective. So Epiphanius, _Haer._ XXXI (p. 328,
Oehler). This is doubtless correct.]
[Footnote 115: Παράκλητος καὶ Πίστις, Πατρικὸς καὶ Ἐλπίς, Μητρικὸς καὶ
Ἀγάπη, Ἀείνους καὶ Σύνεσις, Ἐκκλησιαστικὸς καὶ Μακαριστός, Θελητὸς καὶ
Σοφία. The Codex is here very corrupt, and for Ἀείνους we may, if we
please, read Αἰώνιος, “Everlasting,” and for Μακαριστός, Μακαριότης,
“Blessedness.” As the name of the male partner in each syzygy is an
adjective and that of the female a substantive it is probable that the
two are intended to be read together, as _e.g._ “Profound Admixture,”
and the like.]
[Footnote 116: Sophia, who plays a great part in the Jewish Apocrypha,
is almost certainly a figure of the prototypal earth like Spenta
Armaiti, her analogue in Mazdeism. Cf. the quotation from Genesis which
follows immediately.]
[Footnote 117: οὐσία. Here “substance” and “essence” would have the
same meaning, and the first-named word is used only to avoid ambiguity.]
[Footnote 118: Gen. i. 2.]
[Footnote 119: Exod. xxxiii. 3.]
[Footnote 120: Ἔκτρωμα.]
[Footnote 121: Ἐπιπροβληθεὶς οὖν ὁ Χριστὸς καὶ τὸ Ἅγιον Πνεῦμα. Christ
and the Holy Spirit are therefore treated as a syzygy and, as it were,
a single person.]
[Footnote 122: μονογενές.]
[Footnote 123: τὸ ὑστέρημα: “the Void,” the converse and opposite of
the Pleroma or “Fulness.”]
[Footnote 124: For this Platonic theory of “partaking,” see n. on I, p.
53 _supra_.]
[Footnote 125: So that the first work of the Mission of Jesus was the
freeing of the whole universe--not only our earth--from the evil which
had entered into it.]
[Footnote 126: ὑποστάτους οὐσίας; “underlying beings.” Here we have the
two ideas of hypostasis, or “substance” in its etymological meaning,
and “essence,” or “being,” side by side.]
[Footnote 127: ψυχικὴν οὐσίαν, _i. e._ the stuff of which the soul is
made.]
[Footnote 128: Ps. cxi. 10; Prov. i. 7; ii. 10.]
[Footnote 129: That is Jehovah, the God of the Jews. Hebdomad as
including the seven “planets.”]
[Footnote 130: Deut. ix. 3.]
[Footnote 131: The “below,” Ὑποκάτω, and “above,” ὑπεράνω, seem to have
become inverted; but as I am not sure whether this is the scribe’s
mistake or not, I have left the text as it is. If we consider (as we
must) that the heaven of Sophia is the highest and those of the seven
worlds below it like steps of a ladder, we have the conception of
Sophia, her son Jaldabaoth, and his six sons, current among the Ophites
as shown in Book V above. The figure of Sophia as a “day” is at once an
instance of the curious habit among the Gnostics of confusing time and
space, and an allusion to the O.T. name of “Ancient of Days.”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account