Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
A translator’s prime duty is to follow his author, for which purpose
he must first understand him, a requirement not very easily here
fulfilled. The texts of the _Q.N._ vary greatly, as already indicated,
and it is no easy matter to select any one that might be consistently
followed. The most recent and best text, the Teubner, edited by Gercke,
has strong claims, and had it been my good fortune to have it by me
when the translation was made, I should have been tempted to adopt
it _simpliciter_, even though in many details it departs somewhat
violently from the accepted arrangement. As it was, it did not come to
hand until the translation was finished and paged for publication, so
that full use could not be made of it. In a few cases its corrections
had been anticipated; in some its readings have been adopted; some that
could not be incorporated are referred to in a note on the subject.
The text being settled, the translator must, if possible, put himself
in the author’s position and obtain his point of view.
In science, particularly, the _milieu_ of the author must be caught
if his thoughts are to be accurately reproduced. The danger of
attributing to Seneca ideas that were unknown to him and that are due
to modern analysis and discovery has to be constantly present to one’s
mind. For example, “homogeneity,” “elasticity,” “electricity,” “gas,”
“explosion,” etc., are a few of the terms that his language suggests,
but that would probably convey a wrong impression of his conception
of the phenomena to which they relate. They have been thus ruled out.
Nor is Seneca consistent in the use of the terms he employs; he has
no scientific vocabulary. In a separate note attention is called to
his words for “air” and “atmosphere”; but there are many other terms
that belong to the same category. These are, for instance, three
words for “thick” or “dense,” _crassus_, _densus_, _spissus_, which
he seems to use almost indifferently, at any rate without any precise
discrimination. So with terms like “_impetus_” (impulse, onset)
“_impulsus_” (shove, impulse), “_ictus_” (stroke, blow), “_vis_”
(force, quantity, amount), “_curro_” (to run (river), to revolve
(heavenly body)), and its compounds, _eo_ (to go), and its compounds,
etc., etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account