Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Nor is this merely the madness of vulgar error; even the philosophers
are tainted by it. Men there are who think that they themselves have 14
a mind, one, too, that foresees and orders events in detail whether
relating to themselves or to others. But this frame of things, in which
we men along with the rest of creation are set, they deem void of
counsel, hurried hither and thither at random; or at best, nature, they
suppose, does not know what her own aim is. How profitable then, think
you, will it be to ascertain the truth on such questions and exactly
to define each position! For example, what is the extent of the power
of God? Does He create matter or does He employ matter already given?
Does the pre-existing archetype give shape to matter, or does the
matter determine the shape? Can God perform anything He wishes, or does
material fail Him in many cases, just as a great artist often produces
inferior work, not through any defect in his art, but because the 15
material on which it is exercised is refractory? To search into such
things, to learn them, to meditate upon them--why, is it not in effect
to transcend the limits of mortality and to be enrolled a citizen of a
higher state? What good will it do you, you ask. Well, if nothing else,
I shall, at any rate, know that measured by divine standard all earthly
things are mean. But of this more anon.
I
To come now to my purpose--listen to the explanation offered by 1
Natural Philosophy concerning _the Fires_ which the atmosphere drives
athwart. Their oblique course and amazing velocity furnish proof that
they are thrust out with great violence. Evidently they do not come
forth of themselves, they are shot out. There are many different forms
of them. A certain kind of them Aristotle calls a She-Goat. If you
ask me why, I must retort by asking you first to explain why they are
also called Kids. It will, perhaps, be more to the purpose not to 2
cross-examine one another with questions such as: What does such
and such an author say? Answer me. Better examine the cause of the
phenomenon itself than form surmises as to why Aristotle has applied
the name She-Goat to a ball of fire. This was the shape of the one
as big as the moon that appeared when Paulus was engaged in the war
against Perseus. In our own days we have more than once seen a huge
ball-shaped flame which broke up in the very middle of its course. We 3
saw a similar portent about the time of the death of the late Emperor
Augustus. We again saw one when Sejanus was executed. A warning of the
same kind preceded the death of Germanicus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account