Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
Let us inquire how it is produced. Some authorities say that there are
certain drops of water that transmit light, while some are too compact
to be translucent. Thus the brightness is the effect of the former; the
shadow, of the latter; by the intermingling of the two is formed the
rainbow, part of which is bright, to wit, that which admits sunlight,
part darker, namely, that which has shut out the light and cast a
shadow from itself over the objects nearest it. Others again deny that 4
this is so. Shade and light, they say, might be the cause if the
rainbow had only two colours, and thus was made up of light and shade.
But now, though there gleam a thousand diverse hues,
Their changes withal elude the eyes that behold.
The hues that touch seem actually one, yet the edges are quite different.
In it sight detects something that is red, something that is orange,
something that is blue; and there are other colours too, laid on in
finest lines just like a skilful painting, so that, as the poet remarks
above, it is impossible to discover whether the colours differ from one
another until the last of them is compared with the first. The junction 5
of colour with colour deceives the sight: with such marvellous skill
does nature starting from what is like end in what is totally unlike.
What good, then, do the two alleged colours, light and shade, do in
a case of this kind, when the presence of an endless variety must
be accounted for? Again, certain authorities are of opinion that the
following is the method of formation of the rainbow: In the quarter of
the sky where rain is falling, they say, the drops of falling rain are
so many mirrors; from each mirror, therefore, is reflected an image of
the sun. By and by, many, in fact, countless, images, descending and
crossing abruptly, are all blended together. Therefore the rainbow is
just a blending of a great number of images of the sun. They appeal to
the following argument in proof of this: On a clear day, say they, 6
set out a thousand basins, and they will all contain images of the sun.
Or arrange single drops of water on single leaves; they will each have
an image of the sun. On the other hand, an immense pond will have no
more than one image. Why so? Just because every smooth surface that is
fenced off, and surrounded by its own boundaries, is a mirror. Again,
divide a pond of very large size into several small ponds by inserting
partition walls; it will show as many images of the sun as it has
divisions. Leave it as it was, spreading out to its full extent, and it
will show but one reflection of him. The small extent of the liquid or 7
pond makes no manner of difference. If the surface is circumscribed,
it forms a mirror. Well then, those countless drops, which are carried
down by a falling shower, are so many mirrors, and contain so many
reflections of the sun. To an observer right in front of them they
present the appearance of being mixed up: the intervals which part
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account