Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community — John Shaqi
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
This propensity does not always show itself in relation to some
one remedy, but sometimes leads to the adoption of some system or
class of remedies. I mention as an example the Thompsonian system. A
certain group of remedies was selected by the founder of this system,
from the whole kingdom of nature, as the remedies above all others,
if not alone, fitted to attack the great unit, disease. The very
idea of discrimination was discarded. The unit was to be attacked
with these weapons, and the attack kept up till it was destroyed. No
fear was indulged that any harm could be done, for Thompson claimed
that his remedies had a natural relation to disease, possessed by
no other agents, and that therefore, however largely they might
be taken, they could not possibly do any injury. How beautifully
simple this system of practice is; and, if its claims be just, what
a perfect relief it brings to all the uncertainty of medicine! Away
then with all care-worn experience, and all study! Keep up a constant
fire of lobelia, red pepper, and steam, and you will certainly kill
the disease at last—at least if you do not kill the patient. In
the infancy of this system, this idea of its simplicity was more
distinctly avowed than it is now, and the remedies that were used
were much less in number than they now are. The followers of Thompson
are certainly departing from the stern principles of his doctrine,
and some of them even begin to talk about the necessity of study—a
heresy, one would think, glaring enough almost to start Samuel
Thompson from his grave!
It is most impudently asserted by Thompsonians, that physicians
generally act upon the same exclusive principles that they themselves
do—that while Thompsonians give lobelia and cayenne in all cases, we
do the same in regard to calomel, antimony, &c. This is undoubtedly
true of some physicians, but it is a gross slander when it is applied
to the profession in the mass. The real difference in this matter
between Thompsonians and physicians is this. While Thompsonians
confine themselves to one particular set of remedies for all
diseases, physicians use in their daily practice a great variety of
remedies, and among them the very medicines used by Thompsonians. We
have never claimed, as Thompsonians falsely state that we do, that
lobelia and cayenne are not good medicines, but simply that they are
not applicable to all cases, any more than is calomel, or any other
remedy that may be named.
The quack shows in his advertisements, that he is aware of the
prevalence of the propensity of which I have spoken, and here rests
his chief hope of success. He begins his advertisement with something
of this kind. Disease is an unit; or, All disease is in the blood;
therefore the blood must be purified; or, Grand catholicon; or, Grand
antidote to disease; or, The real essence of life at last discovered.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account