Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the communityHooker, Worthington
Science
Physician and patient : $b or, a practical view of the mutual duties, relations and interests of the medical profession and the community
Hooker, Worthington
Medical ethics; Physician and patient; Physicians; Quacks and quackery
No class of men have done more harm by giving certificates of
cures by quack medicines, than clergymen. They are so situated in
the discharge of their parochial duties, that they are apt to be
drawn into the signing of such certificates. They hear the glowing
statements recited by patients and their friends. They, of course,
sympathize with the relieved sufferers. They do not sift and examine
the statements, for it seems almost unfeeling to doubt. They often,
therefore, give these statements full credence, and furnish the
empiric with certificates. Certificates from such sources are highly
prized, and are, therefore, eagerly sought for. But clergymen should
consider what they are doing by this course. The facts which I have
stated show, that by such acts they uphold a system of impositions,
and help quackery to destroy the lives of their fellow men.
The feeling which physicians manifest in regard to empiricism, is
very commonly supposed to be prompted by self-interest. This is far
from being true. It would not be at all for the pecuniary interest
of physicians to have quackery suppressed; for it is continually
furnishing them with patients, in whom disease has been created or
aggravated by the use of empirical remedies.
I trust that it is obvious to the reader, from the facts which I
have stated, that the medical profession are right in the ground
which they have for the most part maintained against secret and
patent medicines. The rule which they have adopted, in regard to
themselves, on this point, is thus given in Percival’s Medical
Ethics: “No physician or surgeon should dispense a secret nostrum,
whether it be his invention or exclusive property; for if it be of
real efficacy, the concealment of it is inconsistent with beneficence
and professional liberality. And if mystery alone give it value
and importance, such craft implies either disgraceful ignorance or
fraudulent avarice.”[8]
This rule recognizes a very just distinction between inventions in
medicine and all other inventions. As medicine has to do with such
important interests as health and life, the principles of benevolence
demand, that any invention or discovery in this art, should be
promulgated without any hindrance. And this is the more necessary,
because nearly all of the so-called _new_ medicines, put forth from
time to time, have nothing new in them, and mystery alone gives them
their value and importance in the eyes of the public. The claims
which are set up for the great mass of popular remedies, blazoned
forth in newspaper, pamphlet, almanac, and handbill so profusely,
are gross impositions; and an exposure of the formulas, according to
which these medicines are compounded, would show them to be so.[9]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account