Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"Plutarch
Philosophy
Plutarch's essays and miscellanies, Vol. 2 (of 5) : $b Comprising all his works collected under the title of "Morals"
Plutarch
Classical literature; Essays; Ethics; Philosophy
of Demonides the cripple (which, when he had lost them, he wished
might suit the feet of him that stole them) were but unhandsome shoes,
but yet fit for the man they were made for; so we may say of such
expressions as these:—
’Tis worth the while an unjust act to own,
When it sets him that does it on a throne;[24]
Get the repute of Just for a disguise,
And in it do all things whence gain may rise,
A talent dowry! Could I close my eyes
In sleep, or live, if thee I should despise?
And should I not in hell tormented be,
Could I be guilty of profaning thee?[25]
These, it is true, are wicked as well as false speeches, but yet are
decent enough in the mouth of an Eteocles, an Ixion, and an old griping
usurer. If therefore we mind our children that the poets write not
such things as praising and approving them, but do really account
them base and vicious and therefore accommodate such speeches to
base and vicious persons, they will never be damnified by them from
the esteem they have of the poets in whom they meet with them. But,
on the contrary, the suspicions insinuated into them of the persons
will render the words and actions ascribed to them suspected for evil,
because proceeding from such evil men. And of this nature is Homer’s
representation of Paris, when he describes him running out of the
battle into Helen’s bed. For in that he attributes no such indecent act
to any other, but only to that incontinent and adulterous person, he
evidently declares that he intends that relation to import a disgrace
and reproach to such intemperance.
4. In such passages therefore we are carefully to observe whether or
not the poet himself do anywhere give any intimation that he dislikes
the things he makes such persons say; which, in the prologue to his
Thais Menander does, in these words:—
Therefore, my Muse, describe me now a whore,
Fair, bold, and furnished with a nimble tongue;
One that ne’er scruples to do lovers wrong;
That always craves, and denied shuts her door;
That truly loves no man, yet, for her ends,
Affection true to every man pretends.
But Homer of all the poets does it best. For he doth beforehand, as it
were, bespeak dislike of the evil things and approbation of the good
things he utters. Of the latter take these instances:—
He readily did the occasion take,
And sweet and comfortable words he spake;[26]
By him he stood, and with soft speeches quelled
The wrath which in his heated bosom swelled.[27]
And for the former, he so performs it as in a manner solemnly to forbid
us to use or heed such speeches as those he mentions, as being foolish
and wicked. For example, being to tell us how uncivilly Agamemnon
treated the priest, he premises these words of his own,—
Not so Atrides: he with kingly pride
Repulsed the sacred sire, and thus replied;[28]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account