Presidential Candidates:: Containing Sketches, Biographical, Personal and Political, of Prominent Candidates for the Presidency in 1860Bartlett, D. W. (David W.)
History
Presidential Candidates:: Containing Sketches, Biographical, Personal and Political, of Prominent Candidates for the Presidency in 1860
Bartlett, D. W. (David W.)
Statesmen -- United States; United States -- Biography
"But I am told on all sides, 'Oh, just wait; the pro-slavery
clause will be voted down.' That does not obviate any of my
objections; it does not diminish any of them. You have no more
right to force a free-State constitution on Kansas than a
slave-State constitution. If Kansas wants a slave-State
constitution, she has a right to it; if she wants a free-State
constitution she has a right to it. It is none of my business
which way the slavery clause is decided. I care not whether it is
voted down or voted up. Do you suppose, after the pledge of my
honor that I would go for that principle, and leave the people to
vote as they chose, that I would now degrade myself by voting one
way if the slavery clause be voted down, and another way if it be
voted up? I care not how that vote may stand. I take it for
granted that it will be voted out. I think I have seen enough in
the last three days to make it certain that it will be returned
out, no matter how the vote may stand.
"Sir, I am opposed to that concern, because it looks to me like a
system of trickery and jugglery to defeat the fair expression of
the will of the people. There is no necessity for crowding this
measure, so unfair, so unjust as it is in all its aspects, upon
us. Why can we not now do what we proposed to do in the last
Congress? We then voted through the Senate an enabling act, called
'the Toombs bill,' believed to be just and fair in all its
provisions, pronounced to be almost perfect by the senator from
New Hampshire (Mr. Hale), only he did not like the man, then
President of the United States, who would have to make the
appointments. Why can we not take that bill, and, out of
compliment to the President, add to it a clause taken from the
Minnesota act, which he thinks should be a general rule, requiring
the constitution to be submitted to the people, and pass that?
That unites the party. You all voted, with me, for that bill, at
the last Congress. Why not stand by the same bill now? Ignore
Lecompton, ignore Topeka; treat both those party movements as
irregular and void; pass a fair bill--the one that we framed
ourselves when we were acting as a unit; have a fair election, and
you will have peace in the Democratic party, and peace throughout
the country, in ninety days. The people want a fair vote. They
never will be satisfied without it. They never should be satisfied
without a fair vote on their constitution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account