Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
As far as the Indo-European period is concerned it seems now to
be agreed that there were then three seasons: for only the roots
occurring in the words _hiems_, _ver_, and _summer_ recur in a
greater number of the Indo-European languages. The much criticised
statement of Tacitus about the Germans is therefore corroborated:
“They know and name winter and spring and summer, but are ignorant
of the name and the goods of harvest”[320]. Spring however is not
equivalent to the other two seasons, for Indo-European antiquity
certainly also divided the year into two parts, the cold and the
warm seasons. The question whether the primitive Indo-European tribe
had two or three seasons is therefore pointless, and that this is so
will be readily understood by anyone who has become familiar with
the overlapping and the instability of the seasons of the primitive
peoples. The same phenomenon repeats itself in the addition of a
fourth season. The Greeks complete the circle of the year with the
three seasons winter, spring, and summer (χειμών, ἔαρ, θέρος), but in
Homer the fruit-harvest, ὀπώρη, already appears with the pretensions
of an independent season. Alkman has these four[321]. The principle
of nomenclature is however different: the first three names are
derived from climatic phenomena, ὀπώρα from the fruit-harvest. Now
since four climatic periods are naturally to be distinguished--cold,
warmth, and two transitional periods--the logical consequence is that
the fourth season should also be referred to the climate, and indeed
to the still unnamed period of transition between summer and winter.
This period however does not coincide with ὀπώρα, but follows it.
The latter term is therefore corrected to φθιν- or μετόπωρον; the
ὀπώρα naturally persists as the fruit harvest, and Theophrastus[322]
counts it in addition to the other four and thus gets five seasons.
The same thing seems to have happened in the case of the Latin
_autumnus_, although the process cannot be demonstrated. If the
small seasons are included the circle may be still further extended.
Thus the pseudo-Hippocratean treatise Περὶ ἑβδομάδων[323] gives
seven seasons:--1, seed-time, σπορητός, from the early rising of the
Pleiades to the winter solstice; 2, winter, until the late rising
of Arcturus; 3, tree-planting, φυταλιά, up to the spring equinox;
4, spring; 5, summer, from the early rising of the Pleiades up to
that of Sirius; 6, fruit-harvest, ὀπώρα, until the early rising of
Arcturus; 7, autumn. This arrangement is certainly affected by the
septenary system which pervades the treatise, but is founded on a
popular basis: the smaller seasons, which otherwise pass into the
greater, are given an independent position by the side of these.
The system has not prevailed, it is true, but it affords a typical
example of the instability of the seasons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account