I have not myself traversed the desert to the east of Sheb, but
according to an intelligent Arab who has recently made the journey from
Sheb to Dungul, there are only two spots between these places at which
water is obtainable; they are Bir Abu Seifa, a small well of good water
about 50 kilometres from Sheb, and Bir Haleifa, about 15 kilometres
farther on, where there is a fort and numerous wells. This latter place
must, I think, be the same as the Bir Nakhlai, of which the position
found astronomically by Colonel Talbot in 1893 was lat. 22° 29′ 1″,
long. 30° 19′ 36″.
_The Rest-house at Mut_, in Dakhla Oasis, is a low whitewashed building
of three rooms, situated on open ground a little to the south of the
village. It is conspicuous by reason of its isolation from other
buildings, and forms a convenient starting-point for car journeys to the
south-west of Dakhla, as well as for journeys to Kharga by the southern
track which was mostly followed by cars during the war.
_Abu Mungar_ proved to be very close to the position given by Mr.
Harding King’s observations of 1912.[63] To the south-east of Abu
Mungar, about halfway to Dakhla, are two remarkable hills forming
outliers of the plateau. These hills, which are good landmarks, were
first discovered by Mr. Harding King, and as they appear to possess no
native name, I have called them “King’s Hills” on the map. The farther
one of the two from the plateau lies in lat. 25° 58′, long. 28° 11′,
from compass-bearings which I took to it on a careful car-traverse in
1924. The other is about 2 kilometres farther north.
_Qasr Farafra._—The position of the village of Qasr Farafra which I gave
in my paper of 1919[64] is proved to be very nearly correct by the
latest observations. The main advantage of the new determination is that
it is referred to an easily identifiable landmark, the tomb of Sheikh
Dakhil, instead of to the ill-defined centre of the village.
_Levels in or near Baharia Oasis._—I think it may be well to record here
that owing to an unfortunate mistake about the datum to which the level
of the old military railway-terminus at B6 was referred, all the
altitudes given on pp. 10 and 11 of my above-mentioned Survey Department
Paper of 1919 require a correction of 19 metres to be added. At the time
when I triangulated Baharia in 1917, I was informed that the level found
by the military authorities for the terminus was measured from the sea-
level datum, and I employed the value given for it as my fundamental
level. But I have since ascertained that an arbitrary datum was employed
by the military engineers; and trigonometric levelling from the Nile
Valley has shown that this arbitrary datum was about 19 metres above
sea-level.
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account