Proceedings of the expedition to explore the northern coast of Africa, from Tripoly eastward : $b in MDCCCXXI. and MDCCCXXII., comprehending an account of the Greater Syrtis and Cyrenaica; and of the ancient cities composing the pentapolisBeechey, Frederick William
History
Proceedings of the expedition to explore the northern coast of Africa, from Tripoly eastward : $b in MDCCCXXI. and MDCCCXXII., comprehending an account of the Greater Syrtis and Cyrenaica; and of the ancient cities composing the pentapolis
Beechey, Frederick William
Sidra, Gulf of (Libya); Tripoli (Libya) -- Antiquities; Tripoli (Libya) -- Discovery and exploration
The region of the Cinyphus has been celebrated for its extraordinary
fertility; Herodotus asserts that it yielded three hundred for one,
and other writers have concurred in extolling the richness of its
soil[24]. It is remarkable, however, that some authors who have
highly commended the soil of the Byzacium, have, at the same time,
omitted to notice the fertility of the region of the Cinyphus; while
others, on the contrary, who have recorded the extraordinary produce
of the district last mentioned, have failed to make any allusion
to the productive qualities of the Byzacium. This circumstance
has induced Dr. Della Cella to imagine that some of the writers
in question intended to include both these districts in one; and
in support of this idea he cites passages from Pliny and Strabo,
which appear to him decisive in its favour. Pliny says (it is
Dr. Della Cella who speaks) that “the people who inhabit the
Byzacium are called Libyphœnices[25];” it is therefore only
necessary to ascertain in what country the Libyphœnices dwelt,
to determine the position of the Byzacium[26]. And here, continues
the Doctor, is a very clear reply of Strabo to this desideratum of
ancient geography—“Upon the sea-coast, extending from Carthage
to the Cephalas Promontorium, and to the _Masselibii_[27], is the
territory of the Libyphœnices.”
But it will scarcely, we imagine, be thought absolutely necessary
to conclude, that, because Byzacium may have formed a _part_ of the
territory of the Libyphœnices, the _whole_ of the country inhabited
by these people must therefore be called Byzacium; for Strabo himself
has informed us that the Byzacians extended only to the _eastern_
limits of Carthage (that is, of Carthage Proper, or Zeugitana);
whereas the tract which he has assigned to the Libyphœnices
generally, comprehended the whole of the Carthagenian territory,
from the Cephalas Promontorium to the country of the Massæsyli. The
Massæsyli were a people of Numidia, and their district formed
the _western_ boundary of that country and Mauretania; so that
between them and the Byzacians (whom we may, surely, conclude
to be the inhabitants of the country from which their name is
derived) the whole of Numidia and Carthage Proper intervenes. The
Libyphœnices appear to have been the descendants of the Phœnicians
(or Carthaginians) and of the several native African, or Libyan,
tribes in their neighbourhood; so that Byzacium would naturally
be peopled by them to a considerable extent, without its being
necessary to infer from that circumstance that all Libyphœnices
were Byzacians.
We may add that Strabo does not seem to be aware of any fertility
in the soil of the Byzacium; for he continues to state (after
the passage above quoted from the Second Book of his Geography)
that all the country between Carthage and the _columns of Hercules_
is fertile—not including, of course, either the Byzacium, or the
region of the Cinyphus[28].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account