It is possible therefore that the festival took its name from natural
holes in the ground in the district of the Limnae where it was
celebrated, a district to this day riddled with Turkish cisterns made of
great earthen jars (πίθοι). Such holes may have been used for graves, and
were in many parts of Greece regarded as the constant haunt of ghosts
going up and down. They were perhaps the prototypes of the ‘chasms in the
earth’ seen in the vision of Er[75]. Near akin were the megara or chasms
of Demeter at Potniae[76], and the clefts on and about the Pnyx where
the women celebrated the Thesmophoria (p. 125). Such chasms would be the
natural sanctuaries of a Ge and ghost cult.
It is obvious that the two forms χύτροι and χύτραι would easily pass over
into each other, and it is hard to say which came first. It is also to be
noted that, though the masculine form more often means natural hole, it
is also used for artificial pot. Pollux[77], in discussing ‘the vessels
used by cooks,’ says that when Delphilos speaks of the big pot (χύτρον
μέγαν) at the cook’s, he clearly means the χύτρα, not the foot-pan
(χυτρόποδα). Though the form χύτροι ultimately established itself, the
associations of χύτρα, artificial pot, seem to have prevailed, and these
associations are important and must be noted.
Hesychius[78] says that by φαρμακή is meant the χύτρα which they prepared
for those who cleansed the cities. From the scholiast on the _Choephoroi_
of Aeschylus[79] we learn that the Athenians purified their houses with a
censer made of a pot; ‘this they threw away at the meeting of three ways
and went away without turning back.’ Here we have of course the origin
of ‘Hecate’s suppers.’ These were primarily not feasts for the goddess
but purification ceremonies, of which, as no mortal might taste them, it
was supposed an infernal goddess partook. The day of the Chytroi was a
day of such purifications. From some such notion arose the Aristophanic
word ἐγχυτρίζειν, ‘to pot,’ i.e. to utterly ruin and destroy, to make
away with. The scholiast[80] explains it as referring to the practice
of exposing children, but Suidas[81] knows of another meaning; he says
the ἐγχυτρίστριαι were those ‘women who purified the unclean, pouring
upon them the blood of the victim,’ and also those who ‘poured libations
to the dead,’ those in a word who performed ceremonies of placation and
purgation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account