Public health and insurance: American addressesNewsholme, Arthur, Sir
History
Public health and insurance: American addresses
Newsholme, Arthur, Sir
Health insurance -- Great Britain; Public health; Public health -- Great Britain
The title of the act—National (Health) Insurance Act—has hitherto
proved a misnomer. The panel or contract system of medical treatment
of insured persons has done much to continue the obsession of the
public with the conception of medical care as consisting of a “visit
and a bottle”; and so long as the doctor’s medical work is on the
present basis, and he is under the constant temptation, not only to
accept more patients on his panel than he can satisfactorily treat
and to give each patient on application the mental satisfaction of a
“bottle,” but also to be more than lenient in the giving of sickness
certificates, it will remain questionable whether on the balance
state insurance against sickness does more good than harm. If medical
consultants and referees, treatment centres, and hospitals are in the
future provided for insured patients, this will mitigate the evils
of the panel system; but the present contributions of patients will
not purchase this additional provision. All the new money needed,
and most of the money needed under present conditions, must continue
to be provided by the state and employers of the insured (a form of
taxation); and provisions thus made, like the present contributions
of the state for insured persons, are in direct contravention of the
general principle that government grants being derived from the whole
community, should enure to the benefit of the whole community in need
of them, and not only to the benefit of a section of it.
About one-third of the total population of Great Britain is
included within the terms of the National Insurance Act. If the
wives and children of insured men were also included, as has been
proposed, over two-thirds of the total population would be embraced
in the scheme; but as persons manually employed, but working for
themselves—e.g., cotters and hawkers, are encluded, and as persons
not manually employed cannot be insured unless their income is below
£160 (recently raised to £250), large classes of the population who
can ill-afford to pay for their own medical attendance are excluded
from the operation of the act, and taxed to pay the benefits of
insured persons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account