I denounced the bill in a voice of thunder,
And a House of fifty Members as "FRAUD and PLUNDER:"
But they only grinned at my desperation
And my lack of all "_powers of ratiocination_."
That GLADSTONE he has quite undone me;
Like any bashaw looks down upon me,
When I kneels to ax for the squires some mercy,
It does no good--but vice varsey.
Oh! lackaday,
Pity JOHNNY, lackaday!
[_Exit L._
* * * * *
HOPING AGAINST HOPE.--Taking a ticket in a Betting-Office.
* * * * *
INFINITESIMAL LOGIC.
[Illustration: W]
We agree with PROFESSOR FARADAY that there is something very startling
in the condition of the public mind in regard to scientific reasoning.
Here is a specimen--if correctly reported--of the ratiocination of a
British Legislator, and a gentleman of more than average education,
moreover, a polemic of considerable celebrity; relative to a simple
question of evidence. At a recent meeting of the "English Homoeopathic
Association," according to the _Morning Post_:--
"MR. MIALL, M.P., moved the adoption of the report, and stated that
he had become a convert to the truth of the principles of
Homoeopathy from seeing their effects as regarded a
relative--though, thanks to the goodness of Providence, he had no
personal experience of them."
To any one possessed of common understanding and decent information, who
is accustomed to exercise the least caution in drawing inferences, who
has the slightest glimmering of an idea of the nature of inductive
proof, who does not, in short, jump to his conclusions like a kangaroo,
it is truly marvellous that any sane human mind should be capable of
such a generalization as the above. MR. MIALL says that he became "a
convert to the principles of Homoeopathy"--whence? From carefully
sifting an accumulation of evidence, patiently comparing and analysing
hosts of facts? No; but "from seeing their effects as regarded a
relative."
This is just the mental process by which an old woman arrives at a faith
in HOLLOWAY'S or MORISON'S PILLS.
Observe, too, that the thing which MR. MIALL is persuaded of with such
facility, is one which is, so far from being in itself likely,
anteriorly improbable in the very highest degree, and, indeed,
ridiculously absurd on the first face of it.
It is curious how nonsensically men, otherwise intelligent, will argue
whenever they meddle with a question relative to medicine. A man is
reckoned a fool for talking about any other subject which he does not
understand; but it seems to be assumed that there is a specialty in
medical matters, which admits of sound opinions being formed respecting
them by people who are entirely ignorant of them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account