Mr. Samuel Prong was a little man, over thirty, with scanty,
light-brown hair, with a small, rather upturned nose, with eyes by no
means deficient in light and expression, but with a mean mouth. His
forehead was good, and had it not been for his mouth his face would
have been expressive of intellect and of some firmness. But there
was about his lips an assumption of character and dignity which
his countenance and body generally failed to maintain; and there
was a something in the carriage of his head and in the occasional
projection of his chin, which was intended to add to his dignity, but
which did, I think, only make the failure more palpable. He was a
devout, good man; not self-indulgent; perhaps not more self-ambitious
than it becomes a man to be; sincere, hard-working, sufficiently
intelligent, true in most things to the instincts of his
calling,--but deficient in one vital qualification for a clergyman of
the Church of England; he was not a gentleman. May I not call it a
necessary qualification for a clergyman of any church? He was not a
gentleman. I do not mean to say that he was a thief or a liar; nor
do I mean hereby to complain that he picked his teeth with his fork
and misplaced his "h's." I am by no means prepared to define what
I do mean,--thinking, however, that most men and most women will
understand me. Nor do I speak of this deficiency in his clerical
aptitudes as being injurious to him simply,--or even chiefly,--among
folk who are themselves gentle; but that his efficiency for clerical
purposes was marred altogether, among high and low, by his misfortune
in this respect. It is not the owner of a good coat that sees
and admires its beauty. It is not even they who have good coats
themselves who recognize the article on the back of another. They who
have not good coats themselves have the keenest eyes for the coats
of their better-clad neighbours. As it is with coats, so it is with
that which we call gentility. It is caught at a word, it is seen at a
glance, it is appreciated unconsciously at a touch by those who have
none of it themselves. It is the greatest of all aids to the doctor,
the lawyer, the member of Parliament,--though in that position a man
may perhaps prosper without it,--and to the statesman; but to the
clergyman it is a vital necessity. Now Mr. Prong was not a gentleman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account