Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
The evidence fails of proof that the governor ever received a bribe
for his action on any bill,[362] but it is difficult to escape
the suspicion of his complicity in corrupt transactions, if it be
true, as was alleged, that no bill which the governor favored could
fail and none that he opposed could pass. He admitted his use of
his patronage to remove personal enemies and appoint friends “as a
custom of governors”[363] and that the government had been guilty
of some abuses created by his connivance, but emphatically denied
the perpetration of any frauds,[364] declaring on oath that he stood
before the Congressional committee with “clean hands.”[365] But his
duplicity in other ways seems clear, while the fact stands out that
with a salary of eight thousand dollars a year he testified that he had
made far more than one hundred thousand dollars the first year of his
administration[366] and by 1872 was reported worth a million dollars.
He was surely willfully deluding himself when he uttered this boast:
I believe I have since I have been governor of the State, under
circumstances and embarrassments of the gravest character, and under
difficulties that I am surprised myself that I have been able to
overcome, administered the State government in the best interests
of the people of the State, and have produced as much harmony, good
feeling, and prosperity as it was possible for me or any one else to
produce under the circumstances.[367]
In a series of remarkable pen pictures the governor brought charges of
dishonesty against most of the custom-house reformers--against Senators
Ray, Casey, Packard, Lowell,[368] Carter.[369] His attack on Carter may
be considered typical:
Mr. Carter was also, and is now, the paid attorney of the New
Orleans, Mobile, and Texas Railroad Company, from which he receives
$833.33 per month, or $10,000 per annum, and for which he has
never done one hour’s service. The contract for his employment
was made with him by the company after he had kept in his pocket
for thirty or sixty days a bill which had passed the legislature
almost unanimously, and immediately after this contract was made, by
which he became the attorney of the company, the bill was signed by
him.[370]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account