To go a step further. We know that we cannot stop with our own
Western Hemisphere. Our thinking and our responsibility is now
global. There’s “no hidin’ place” anywhere. Therefore we must improve
our position, militarily, economically and psychologically throughout
Europe and Asia by helping nations and peoples there to help
themselves to keep their few remaining freedoms. Of course we have to
protect certain sea and air routes to and from our best sources of
raw materials.
To me, it is sheer nonsense to give, indiscriminately, whether it
be money or military aid, without stipulating that we get something
for it. To do otherwise is contrary to individual human nature, and
yet as a nation, we have given billions in money and material—not
to mention thousands of lives in Korea—without demanding anything
in return. To keep on throwing good money, things and men into the
hopper will bring no permanent relief, nor will it accomplish any
outright objective.
We need oil from the Middle East, uranium from the Belgian Congo,
or anywhere else we can get it, and we need tin and rubber from
southeast Asia, plus other important things. But if we are cut
off and cannot get them, then we can use our almost unprecedented
ingenuity in the department of synthetics. Germany demonstrated what
can be accomplished with ersatz.
I agree heartily with Generals MacArthur and Wedemeyer, and others,
who have not expressed their views openly, or who have so indicated
and been severely reprimanded for it, that we must have areas of
operation such as the British Isles, Formosa, the African coast,
Philippines, Japan, the Scandinavian Peninsula, Denmark, Iberian
Peninsula and Saudi Arabia. These could be held or taken, if need be,
with a minimum of manpower, for we know our weapons are far superior
to those of our enemy, both in mechanics and quality, while their
manpower is far in excess of anything that we can muster. From these
so-called “islands” it would be possible for the allied forces to
rain ultimate death and destruction on the enemy, and without them we
are powerless to strike except from long range.
To those who, like General Marshall, insist that we must have
an enormous land army, or armies, to go in and occupy conquered
territory so as to be able to control the people, I give this answer,
or make this suggestion. Why not establish colonies of people of
all nationalities, who would be charged with responsibilities of
teaching people how to produce or earn a living and to study forms
of government suitable for creating small civil communities that
could be transplanted into any conquered territory after organized
resistance had been broken by the military? This would be entirely
within the realm of possibility, and it would definitely conserve our
most precious potential—manpower.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account