Red Eagle and the Wars With the Creek Indians of Alabama.Eggleston, George Cary
History
Red Eagle and the Wars With the Creek Indians of Alabama.
Eggleston, George Cary
Creek War, 1813-1814; Weatherford, William, approximately 1780-1824
Red Eagle, wiser than his enemy, respected him, and advanced so
cautiously that he actually placed his army within striking distance of
the fort without Beasley's knowledge, and concealed his men so adroitly
that Beasley's scouting parties failed to discover them. Beasley was as
brave a man as Red Eagle, but Red Eagle had the other qualities of a
soldier--sagacity, caution, tireless watchfulness--which Beasley lacked;
in a contest between the two as commanders, Red Eagle was Beasley's
master. One day, while Red Eagle was thus hovering about the fort,
watching it as a cat watches its prey, two negroes, who had been
guarding some cattle, ran in great terror to the fort, and reported that
they had seen Indians in the immediate neighborhood. Major Beasley at
once sent a body of horsemen under command of Captain Middleton to
ascertain the facts of the case. Captain Middleton, accompanied by the
negroes, went to the spot where they said they had seen the savages;
finding no Indians there, Captain Middleton, who appears to have thought
that Indians are like trees, staying in one place, returned to the fort
and reported that a false alarm had been given. The poor negroes were
denounced as liars, and one of them was flogged for having given a false
alarm. The other was saved for a while by the intercession of his
master, but he was afterward arraigned again, his master's consent
having been gained by Major Beasley's threat to expel him and his family
from the fort if he persisted in his refusal; and it is upon record that
when the fort was attacked the negro was standing tied, and awaiting his
flogging.
This incident is mentioned here in illustration of the unaccountable
folly of Major Beasley. The writers who have recorded the facts of this
officer's behavior have touched them as lightly as possible, sparing him
probably because he fought manfully and fell at his post at last; but it
is impossible to regard his conduct with any thing like respect or even
patience. His carelessness was a crime, and history must condemn it as
such. Charged with the duty of defending an important post, he neglected
the most essential measures of defence; intrusted with the lives of more
than five hundred persons, he carelessly, criminally, permitted them to
be butchered. We have already seen that he neglected discipline in the
fort; he neglected also to surround the fort, as he should have done,
with a cordon of picket-guards, who might have been so placed that ample
warning would have been given of the approach of the enemy. Instead of
that, he actually subjected the negroes who gave warning to ignominious
punishment, and, most incredible thing of all, permitted the gates of
the fort to stand open until the accumulation of sand at their base
rendered it impossible to shut them promptly!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account