Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
“The orthoclase occasionally presents the adular variety, but this never
becomes a marked feature. I have observed the same in many of the
trachytes of the High Plateaus and of the Great Basin. Another
phenomenon is the occurrence of crystals which are quite typically
monoclinic at one end (orthoclase), and at the other end have the
arrangement of plagioclase. This is well known elsewhere, and described
by Zirkel. (Mik. Beschaff der Mineralien u. Gesteine).
“In classifying these rocks therefore, we may observe that they present
a blending of the characteristics which are common to trachyte and
felsitic porphyry. Those who regard porphyry as a distinct class of
eruptive rocks would have no hesitation in calling Nos. 18, 56, 61, 68,
and 69 undebatable felsitic porphyries, and to the same series might
with propriety be added No. 33. With equal confidence Nos. 16, 20, 35,
and 43 may be called unqualified trachytes. The other rocks are
intermediate in character between these two extremes, and the whole may
be regarded as a series in which the individuals form a graduated scale.
“You will recall the fact that many lithologists object to the terms
porphyry or porphyritic being used to designate a distinct class or
group of rocks, holding that they merely characterize a single feature
which is more or less frequently presented by all igneous rocks and
having no necessary relation to any of them, and that this is no more
adequate to such an important distinction than the color or relative
degree of fineness or coarseness of texture. Although this latter view
seems to me to underrate the distinctive value of the porphyritic
character in general, I incline very decidedly to the belief that it is
true as applied to these Henry Mountain rocks. Here at least the
porphyritic character has but little significance. In some varieties the
crystals are larger and more perfect and the groundmass more
homogeneous; in others the crystals are smaller and imperfect, and the
groundmass more coarse and irregular; while still others are ‘betwixt
and between’. The most careful scrutiny fails to show any fundamental
differences in the groundmass or in the included minerals. Hence I think
these rocks would be accurately designated _as a group_ by calling them
porphyritic trachytes. Such varieties as Nos. 16, 20, and 35 may by
themselves be called simply trachyte, the porphyritic character being
insufficiently distinct in them to warrant any qualification of the
name.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account