Report on the geology of the Henry MountainsGilbert, Grove Karl
Science
Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains
Gilbert, Grove Karl
Geology -- Utah -- Henry Mountains; Intrusions (Geology) -- Utah -- Henry Mountains
found on pages 61 to 71 and 163 to 168 of the Annual Report for 1874 of
the “Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories.”
If we turn now to the distinctively volcanic mountains of the Plateau
province—to those which are built by eruption at the surface—we leave at
once the porphyritic trachytes. Mount San Francisco, Mount Bill
Williams, Mount Sitgreaves, Mount Kendrick, Mount Floyd and the Sierra
Blanca (of Arizona) are all composed of basic trachytes, and so are the
Aquarius Plateau and the many tables that lie beyond it.
The Mogollon group, the Marcou Buttes, the minor cones about Mount San
Francisco, the Uinkarets, and the Panguitch Lake group are basaltic. In
each of these instances the igneous rock issued above the surface and
there is no evidence by displacement that any portion of it was
deposited below.
Mount Taylor may be an exception. In the character of its lava and its
general features it resembles Mount San Francisco, but there are
disturbed strata on its southern flank, and it is possible the mountain
is both extrusive and intrusive. Extrusion and intrusion are probably
combined in some small tables lying fifty miles north of the Henry
Mountains. They are built of Flaming Gorge shale, preserved from erosion
by dikes, sheets, and (probably) outflows of basalt.
Combining all these facts we attain to a simple relation between two
types of igneous rock on the one hand, and two types of mountain
structure on the other. One type of rock is acidic, including
“porphyritic trachyte” and “eruptive granite”, and its occurrence is
without exception intrusive. The other type of rock is basic, including
basic trachyte and basalt, and its occurrence is almost uniformly
extrusive.
It is not possible to combine the two groups of phenomena by saying that
in one case the eruptive cones cover laccolites, and in the other the
laccolites have been covered by eruptive cones which have disappeared;
first, because many of the eruptive cones are too well exposed to admit
of the concealment of laccolitic arches beneath them; second, because
the two types of lava are essentially different. The acidic type if
extruded at the surface would be an ordinary trachyte; the basic type if
crystallized under pressure would be classed with the greenstones.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account