in every body's reach, and less for the petted few." [26] In short, the patient having become very sick and attenuated by reason of the low (fiscal) diet upon which he had been fed, the doctors now proposed to resuscitate him by administering a still thinner gruel. All also agreed that the word "money" was a bad name, and that the public would obtain a much clearer idea of the great problems at issue if more intelligible and scientific terms embodying definitions were used. One philosopher accordingly proposed that, as they intended to sprout it everywhere, they should go back to the Biblical designation, and call it the "root," at the same time remarking that "the Lord showed what he thought of money by the kind of people he gave it to." Another proposed to call it "the instrument of association" (Carey); a third, the "sign of transmission, of which the material shall be of native growth" (John Law, 1705); a fourth, "a sense of value as compared with commodities" ("British Tracts on Money," 1795-1810); a fifth, "a standard neither gold nor silver, but something set up in the imagination to be regulated by public opinion" (ibid.). As to what money, under the reform system, was, or should be, was also a question in respect to which there was not at first an entire agreement. One idea which found some favor, was, that money ought to be only a token, representative of services rendered at some indefinite time or place (possibly forgotten or disputed by its recipient), and "for which the holder has not received the equivalent to which he is inherently entitled under the system of division of labor." [27] The best money, therefore, according to the philosophers of this idea, was an evidence that some one person owed some other person; and, consequently, the more debt, the more money; and the more money, the more wealth, unless it is to be supposed (as is not reasonable) that this sort of money was not to have the first attribute of all other money--namely, purchasing power. Moreover, although the philosophers did not exactly say so, the inference was also legitimate, that in a community using merely "token" or "remembrance" money, the surest way to get rich would be to get in debt, and the best way of carrying on an enlightened system of trade and commerce, to exchange commodities, the results of time and labor, for evidences of debt without interest. It is needless to say that these teachings and inferences tended to greatly strengthen the people on the island in the opinion they before entertained, that the currency they already had--namely, evidences of destruction--was the "best currency the world ever saw." The three leaders among the philosophers were not, however, men who were going to be contented with any half-way measures. Had they not put their hands to the plow of reform? and were they, after so doing, to allow the plow to stick fast in the furrow? They accordingly appealed first to authority, and then to untutored reason.