Great Britain -- Foreign relations -- Russia; Russia -- Foreign relations -- Great Britain; Russia -- Social life and customs
Upon this I bowed and resumed my place. My little speech was received
most kindly. There could not have been a better reward for my laconism.
{112}
CHAPTER VIII
JEWISH RUSSOPHOBIA
The Jews and the War--Their Attitude in 1876--Their Hatred of
Slavism--The Problems of Other Countries--English Sympathy--The
Guildhall Meeting--The Russian Government Blamed--Tolstoy and the
Jews--My Jewish Friends--A Curious Tradition--Self-Protection
In many respects the Jewish Question in Russia has now become an
anachronism. I am happy to say that a new argument in favour of the
Jews is the part played by many of them in our ranks during the present
struggle against the Central Empires. Their present attitude has
effaced the great hatred they used to manifest against everything
Russian. But a survey of my work for Anglo-Russian friendship would be
incomplete and would not be honest if it passed over my attitude on
this question, and especially as the attacks made upon me have been
very vigorous and have forced me to retort in what was, for me, an
almost single-handed struggle.
My first public expression of views upon the Jewish Question was in
1882, when I addressed two letters to _The Times_ in which I protested
against the accusations levelled against the Russian Government that it
encouraged the social war against the Jews in the southern provinces.
I pointed out that {113} the origin of the disturbances was economic
rather than religious. I said then, as I shall always say, that the
worst charges brought against the Jews could not by any form of special
pleading be held to justify outrage and murder. I reminded the Jews
that when thousands of harmless peasants, men, women and children, were
being ruthlessly slaughtered in Bulgaria, they ranged themselves beside
those responsible for the massacres, the Turks. The next worst thing
to committing a murder is to look calmly on and sympathise with another
who is taking life. That is what the Hebrews did in 1876. At least
they should be logical, and if they do not like the application of "the
Law," which demands "an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth," they
should have acted differently in 1876.
When Mr. Gladstone and his friends were fighting what seemed to be a
losing battle, the Jews were against them. It was a Jew, Disraeli, who
was the arch-plotter against the freeing of Bulgaria, and with a few
exceptions his race was with him. The Jews hated Slavism, and the
Slavs could not be expected to retort with soft words of brotherly
love. In spite of this, I repeat that the peasant riots against the
Jews in some provinces deserved blame; but the actions of mobs are
never based upon religious principles or religious teaching.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account