Triremes had two kinds of sails and two kinds of masts, but before
battle the larger sail and the larger mast were always put ashore.
Such enormous yards and masts would be very much in the way on boats
of this kind. Regarding the arrangement of the oars of the trireme
much controversy has been raised. The theories of thirty or more
banks of oars have now been pretty well dismissed. The amount of
freeboard that this would have given to a ship must necessarily have
been colossal, and militated against the very object they had in
view, viz., handiness. It is highly probable that the crew consisted
of two hundred rowers, sixty-two on the highest tier, fifty-four
on the middle and fifty-four on the lowest, in addition to thirty
fighting men stationed on the highest deck. The upper oars would thus
pass over what we now call the gunwale, the second and third rows
being through port holes. Even when very large numbers of oarsmen
are mentioned, we must not suppose that there were so many lines of
rowers as that; several men were needed to each oar. Considering
their weight and the size of later ships, this would seem to be very
necessary.
Before we pass from the subject of the trireme, it is not without
interest to mention that in the year 1861 Napoleon III. had
constructed a trireme 39 metres in length and 5½ metres in beam. She
carried 130 oarsmen, who were placed two by two. Of these forty-four
were on the first row, the same number on the second, and forty-two
on the top. Like her ancestors she had a three-fold spur, a rostrum,
and two steering oars. But to us a far more important piece of
information lies in the fact that she was actually experimented
with on the sea at Cherbourg in good weather. It was found that she
bore out all that had ever been written by the ancient historians
concerning her: for she was both very fast and could be manœuvred
with great ease.[14] According to the ancients, a trireme could
average as much as seven and a half knots an hour, covering one
hundred and ten during a day. The merchant ship was going at a good
pace when she reeled off her five knots an hour. Her average was
about sixty knots in a day: but during a whole day and night, with
a favourable wind, she was capable of doing as much as a hundred and
thirty. Comparing this speed with the craft of to-day, it may be
worth noting that the average day’s run of a moderate-sized coaster
would work out at a hundred or hundred and twenty knots. The speed of
the ships of the Mediterranean was not slow, then, though they would
appear ridiculous if compared with some of the marvellous passages
made by the famous old clippers of the second half of the nineteenth
century of our era.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account