Samuel Reynolds House of Siam, pioneer medical missionary, 1847-1876Feltus, George Haws
History
Samuel Reynolds House of Siam, pioneer medical missionary, 1847-1876
Feltus, George Haws
House, Samuel Reynolds, 1817-1899
When once this idea gained the strength of expression he freely
declared his opinion to his fellow missionaries. Then we find the
curious anomaly of a graduate in medicine arguing against the use
of drugs and his patients contending for them. However this was
only a passing phase of “unbelief” in an extreme degree, and his
seeming trend towards faith cure had its own reaction when, a few
years later, we find him having recourse to physicians and drugs
when unaided nature did not bring relief for a wife’s constantly
aching head.
The change from the medical to the evangelistic and educational
form of mission work had an effect upon Dr. House of which perhaps
he was not quite conscious, but which is quite evident to one
who reviews his life in the foreshortened perspective afforded
by the journal. As manifest in the quotations already given, the
medical profession proved to be depressing to him because the
sense of responsibility in decisions coincided too closely with
his natural diffidence; and there was a slow but constant ebbing
of self-confidence. Continuance in the medical work was liable
to have lessened his general effectiveness for missions for this
reason. But the more direct Gospel work of colportage, touring
and teaching seemed to harmonise better with his mind so that he
was buoyed up with hope and inspired with a courage that knew no
obstacles. He had a greater faith in God than in himself, and the
evangelistic work gave the fullest range to that faith, impelling
him to attempt whatever he believed to be his duty without fear of
failure.
AT THE TRACT HOUSE
The larger object which Dr. House had in view in abandoning his
profession was to devote himself more directly to the propagation
of the Gospel. His observation of the physical ailments of the
people disclosed that a large portion of the cases was attributable
to sensualism, brutality or ignorance. This brought him to the
conviction that however merciful and needful was the work of
healing, the Gospel was of primary importance to remove the
infection of sin which was largely responsible for the bodily
sufferings. When others arrived who with greater relish took over
the medical work, he was eager to give himself to the Gospel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account