Length of Time Before Seven Pairs of Talkers Could Detect 1.2 Seconds of
Delay
PAIRS OF TALKERS NUMBER OF SECONDS BEFORE TALKERS DETECTED DELAY
G/H 161
224
107
F/K 87
65
43
220
false alarm
A/L 618
95
367
F/T no detection after 954 seconds
S/H 227
false alarm
90
75
83
K/G 38
421
20
143
S/W 257
229
no detection after 260 seconds
[Illustration: _Data from table have been arranged in this histogram
to show wide range of delay detection times that were recorded in
the experiment. Each block represents a single delay detection,
identified by initials of conversers._]
number of cases
6
S/H
5
S/H
4
S/H S/W
3
K/G A/L S/H
2
K/G F/K K/G F/K
1
F/K F/K G/H G/H S/W A/L K/G A/L
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650
detection time (seconds)
Now, to answer our question about whether people can converse over our
circuit, we can say something like this: We have found some cases (of a
certain type of conversation) where people _can_ use a circuit with 1.2
seconds of echo-free delay for the amounts of time listed in our table.
But there are two important things to remember about our results:
—_The findings are a_ non-negative _answer to the original question,
“Can people converse over a four-wire, echo-free circuit that has
delay like that of a synchronous satellite?”_
—_The experiment applies_ only _to four-wire, echo-free circuits, and
does not help with the problem of improving echo suppressors or with
that of finding out how good synchronous satellite circuits with the
best possible echo suppressors would be if they were used to
interconnect the world’s telephones._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account