At our Murray Hill, New Jersey, laboratories we worked on a different
approach. We exposed transistors like those used in the decoders to
large doses of radiation. We also exposed entire spare decoder units to
accelerated radiation to find out where their weakest points were (_see
illustration_). And then we built and tested decoders using
radiation-resistant transistors to see if they worked better. After a
week of intensive laboratory work, we had some pretty good evidence. The
tests of individual transistors definitely showed that heavy radiation
would cause them to deteriorate. Testing of the complete decoders also
led to some failures, and, when we analyzed them, they turned out to be
the kind that would be caused by faulty transistors. We also discovered
that the most sensitive part of a decoder circuit was the zero gate,
which recognizes the zeros in the one-and-zero code that commands the
satellite.
[Illustration: _A typical command signal sent to Telstar I. It
consists of seven pulses: a three-unit “start” pulse and a binary
code made up of three two-unit “one” pulses and three one-unit
“zero” pulses._]
Fooling the Decoder
Now we thought we knew the guilty component, but the hardest job still
lay ahead of us. We had to do something to the commands so that they
would bypass this troublesome zero gate. Each of the fifteen satellite
commands is a binary code of seven pulses, as illustrated in _the
diagram above_. The first—the _start pulse_—is three units wide. Then
follow six more pulses of which three are two units wide (_one pulses_)
and three are one unit wide (_zero pulses_). The arrangement of this
group of six ones and zeros determines the particular command.
Each time a one pulse arrives at the decoder, a _one gate_ counts the
pulse and stores a one in its memory. A _zero gate_ counts the zero
pulses, but does not store anything. So, if the zero gate is blocked,
the decoder will not count the zeros in any of the coded commands and
thus cannot decode them properly.
[Illustration: _The special “notched one” pulse that was invented to
fool Telstar I command decoder._]
What could be done about this? The answer seemed to be to devise a new
type of pulse—a pulse that would be enough like a one so that it would
pass through the one gate and advance the counter, but, at the same
time, be enough unlike a one so that the one gate would not store it in
its memory. This led to the invention of the special long pulse with a
dip or notch in it that is shown in _the diagram above_. When we tested
it in the laboratory on one of the duplicate decoders we had exposed to
radiation, this new notched pulse worked as we hoped it would. It passed
through the one gate and advanced the counter, but was not stored as a
one in the one gate’s memory. Thus it fooled the decoder by doing just
what a zero is supposed to do, even though it had gone through the one
gate rather than the zero gate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account