Science and Medieval Thought: The Harveian Oration Delivered Before the Royal College of Physicians, October 18, 1900Allbutt, T. Clifford (Thomas Clifford)
Philosophy
Science and Medieval Thought: The Harveian Oration Delivered Before the Royal College of Physicians, October 18, 1900
Allbutt, T. Clifford (Thomas Clifford)
Philosophy, Medieval
[8] Alcuin had but a translated abridgment or summary of the
Categories, attributed to Augustine; and in a MS. of the tenth century
we find no more than this. Boetius’ full translation of the Categories
was not current till the end of this century, when all the logic of
Aristotle was in the hands of the doctors. In the earlier Middle Ages,
as in the writings of John of Salisbury and of William of Conches, we
hear even more of Boetius than of the master himself. Virgil, Seneca
and Cicero also were the sources of much of the culture of this
period. Alcuin was a grammarian; he taught from Priscian and Donatus,
improved the eighth century Latin, and probably made Virgil and Cicero
known in Gaul and Britain. He knew but little Greek, as we infer from
his quotation of the names of the Categories. Erigena knew more Greek
and carried some of it to the Court of Charles the Bald. See note 2,
p. 65. Alcuin probably did not visit Ireland. Boetius had translated
also both Analytics and the Topics.
[9] Yet Roger Bacon seems to have apprehended both progress and the
relativity of truth. Before Newman, he declared that God makes no full
revelation but gives it in instalments; and in another passage he
speaks of the judgments of Aristotle, and of other great teachers,
“secundum possibilitatem sui temporis ... aliud tempus fuit tunc, et
aliud nunc est”—a remarkable saying. Of the Saints he says “they had
their time, we have our own.” Vid. also note, p. 80.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account