Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881
Various
Science -- Periodicals
[Footnote: 'Zeitschrift fur Analyt. Chemie,' 1881.]
Hop flowers contain a great variety of different substances susceptible
of extraction with ether, alcohol, and water, and distinguishable from
one another by tests of a more or less complex character. The substances
are: Ethereal oil, chlorophyl, hop tannin, phlobaphen, a wax-like
substance, the sulphate, ammoniate, phosphate, citrate and malates of
potash, arabine, a crystallized white and an amorphous brown resin, and
a bitter principle. That the characteristic action of the hops is due to
such of these constituents only as are of an organic nature is easy to
understand; but up to the present we are in ignorance whether it is upon
the oil, the wax, the resin, the tannin, the phlobaphen, or the bitter
principle individually, or upon them all collectively, that the effect
of the hops in brewing depends.
It is the rule to judge the strength and goodness of hops by the amount
of farina--the so-called lupuline; and as this contains the major
portion of the active constituents of the hop, there is no doubt that
approximately the amount of lupuline is a useful quantitative test. But
here we are confronted by the question whether the lupuline is to be
regarded as containing _all_ that is of any value in the hops and the
leaves, the organic principles in which pass undetected under such a
test, as supererogatory for brewers' purposes? Practical experience
negatives any such conclusion. Consequently, we are justified in
assuming that the concurrent development and the presence of the several
organic principles--the oil, the wax, the bitter, the tannin, the
phlobaphen, in the choicer sorts--are subject, within certain limits, to
variations depending on skilled culture and careful drying, and that the
aggregate of these principles has a certain attainable maximum in
the finer sorts, under the most favorable conditions of culture, and
another, lower maximum in less perfectly cultivated and wild sorts. The
difference in the proportion of active organic substance in each sort
must be determined by analysis. There then remains to be discovered
which of the aforesaid substances plays the leading role in brewing, and
also whether the presence of chlorophyl and inorganic salts in the hop
extract influences or alters the results.
That in brewing hops cannot be replaced by lupuline alone, even when the
latter is employed in relatively large quantities is well known, as also
that a considerable portion of the bitter principle of the hop is found
in the floral leaves. Neither can the lupuline be regarded as the only
active beer agent, as both the hop-tannin and the hop-resin serve to
precipitate the albuminous matter, and clarify and preserve the beer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account