Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 303, October 22, 1881
Various
Science -- Periodicals
The nature of the fuel required depends on the purpose for which the gas
is used. If for heating boilers, furnaces, etc, coke or any kind of coal
maybe used; but for gas engines or any application of the gas requiring
great cleanliness and freedom from sulphur and ammonia it is best to use
anthracite, as this does not yield condensable vapors, and is very free
from impurities. Good qualities of this fuel contain over 90 per cent of
carbon and so little sulphur that, for some purposes, purification is
not necessary. For gas engines, etc., it is, however, better to pass
the gas through some hydrated oxide of iron to remove the sulphureted
hydrogen. The oxide can be used over and over again after exposure to
the air, and the purifying is thus effected without smell or appreciable
expense. Gas made by this process and with anthracite coal has no tar
and no ammonia, and the small percentage of carbon dioxide present does
not sensibly affect the heating power. A further advantage of this gas
is that it cannot burn with a smoky flame, and there is no deposition of
soot even when the object to be heated is placed over or in the flame,
and this is of importance for the cylinder and valves of a gas engine.
To produce 1,000 cubic feet only 12 lb. of anthracite are required,
allowing 8 to 10 per cent, for impurities and waste; thus a generator
A size, which produces 1,000 cubic feet per hour, needs only 12 lb. in
that time, and this can be added once an hour or at longer intervals. No
skilled labor is necessary, and in practice it is usual to employ a man
who has other work to attend to near the generator, and to pay him a
small addition to his usual wages.
The comparative explosive force of coal gas and the Dowson gas
calculated in the usual way is as 3.4:1, i. e., coal gas has 3.4 times
more energy than the writer's gas. Messrs. Crossley, of Manchester, the
makers of the Otto gas engines, have made several careful trials of this
gas with some of their 3½ horse power (nominal) engines, and in one
trial they took diagrams every half-hour for nine consecutive days.
These practical trials have shown that without altering the cylinder of
the engine it is possible to admit enough of the Dowson gas to give
the same power as with ordinary coal gas. It has been seen that the
comparative explosive force of the two gases is as 3.4:1, but as it is
well known the combustion of carbon monoxide proceeds at a comparatively
slow rate, and for this reason, and because of the diluents present in
the cylinder which affect the weaker gas more than coal gas, experience
has shown that it is best to allow five volumes of the Dowson gas for
one volume of coal gas, and then the same uniform power is obtained as
with the latter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account