Scientific American Supplement, No. 324, March 18, 1882Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 324, March 18, 1882
Various
Science -- Periodicals
10FeO + 2KMnO_{4} = 5Fe_{2}O_{3} + K_{2}O + 2MnO_{2},
it appears, on making a comparison with the formula given above, that
ten equivalents of iron correspond to three equivalents of manganese,
and that there is thus required for three equivalents manganese as
much chameleon solution as for ten equivalents iron. When we know the
titration of the chameleon solution for iron, that for manganese is
obtained by multiplying the former by (3 x 55)/(10 x 56) =0.295. If, for
instance, one cubic centimeter chameleon solution corresponds to 0.01
gramme iron, the figure for manganese is 0.01 x 0.295 = 0.00295 gramme
per cubic centimeter.
We can of course also determine the titration for manganese in a
chameleon solution with the greatest certainty by titrating a compound
of manganese with an accurately estimated content of it, for instance, a
spiegeleisen or ferromanganese; the test is carried out in the following
way: The substance, which is to be examined for manganese, is dissolved
by means of hydrochloric acid. If the manganese, as in slags, be
combined with silica, it is frequently necessary first to fuse the
specimen with soda. Iron ores and refinery cinders may indeed, if they
are reduced to a very fine state of division, be commonly decomposed by
boiling with hydrochloric acid with or without the addition of sulphuric
acid, but the undissolved silica is generally rendered impure by
manganese, which can only be removed by fusion with soda.
The dissolving of the fused mass in hydrochloric acid does not need to
be carried to dryness for the separation of the soluble silica, but the
boiling, after the addition of a little nitric acid, is only kept
up until the iron passes into perchloride and the manganese into
protochloride. The quantity, which ought to be taken for the test,
depends on the accuracy with which it is desired to have the manganese
estimated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account