Scientific American Supplement, No. 508, September 26, 1885Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 508, September 26, 1885
Various
Science -- Periodicals
With such advantages, it may be asked: Why does not the gas-engine
everywhere supersede the steam-engine? My answer is a simple one: The
gas we manufacture is a dear fuel compared with coal. Ordinary coal
gas measures 30 cubic feet to the pound; and 1,000 cubic feet,
therefore, weigh 33 lb. Taking the price at 2s. 9d. per 1,000 cubic
feet, it costs 1d. per lb. The 30 cubic feet at 630[theta] give
19,000[theta] all available heat. Although good coal may yield 14,000
units by its combustion, only about 11,000 of these reach the boiler;
so that the ratio of the useful heat is 11/19. The thermal efficiency
of the best non-condensing engine to that of the gas-engine is in the
ratio 4/22. Multiplying together these two ratios, we get
11 4 44
-- x ------- = ----
19 22_{1/2} 4.28
That is, speaking roughly, 1 lb. of gas gives about ten times as much
power as 1 lb. of coal does in a good non-condensing engine. But at
18s. 8d. a ton we get 10 lb. of coal for 1d.; so that with these
figures the cheapness of the coal would just compensate for the
efficiency of the gas. As to the waste heat passing away from the
engine being utilized, here the gas-engine has no advantage; and, so
far as this is concerned, the gas is about eight times dearer than
coal. The prices of gas and coal vary so much in different places that
it is hard to determine in what cases gas or coal will be the dearer
fuel, considering this point alone.
But there are other kinds of non-illuminating gases--such as Wilson's,
Strong's, and Dowson's--which are now coming into use; and at Messrs.
Crossley's works you will have an opportunity of seeing a large
engineering factory employing several hundred mechanics, and without a
chimney, in which every shaft and tool is driven by gas-engines
supplied by Dowson's gas, and in which the consumption of coal is only
1.2 lb. per indicated horse power. The greatest economy ever claimed
for the steam-engine was a consumption of 1.6 lb.; and this with steam
of very high pressure, expanded in three cylinders successively. Thus
in a quarter of a century the gas-engine has beaten in the race the
steam-engine; although from Watt's first idea of improvement, nearly a
century and a quarter have elapsed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account