Scientific American Supplement, No. 821, September 26, 1891Various
Science
Scientific American Supplement, No. 821, September 26, 1891
Various
Science -- Periodicals
One of the most important results deduced from experiments on model
screws is that they appear to have practically equal efficiencies
throughout a wide range both in pitch ratio and in surface ratio; so
that great latitude is left to the designer in regard to the form of the
propeller. Another important feature is that, although these experiments
are not a direct guide to the selection of the most efficient propeller
for a particular ship, they supply the means of analyzing the
performances of screws fitted to vessels, and of thus indirectly
determining what are likely to be the best dimensions of screw for a
vessel of a class whose results are known. Thus a great advance has been
made on the old method of trial upon the ship itself, which was the
origin of almost every conceivable erroneous view respecting the screw
propeller. The fact was lost sight of that any modification in form,
dimensions, or proportions referred only to that particular combination
of ship and propeller, or to one similar thereto; so something like
chaos was the result. This, however, need not be the case much longer.
In regard to the materials used for propellers, steel has been largely
adopted for both solid and loose-bladed screws; but unless protected in
some way, the tips of the blades are apt to corrode rapidly and become
unserviceable. One of the stronger kinds of bronze is often judiciously
employed for the blades, in conjunction with a steel boss. Where the
first extra expense can be afforded, bronze seems the preferable
material; the castings are of a reliable character, and the metal does
not rapidly corrode; the bronze blades can therefore with safety be made
lighter than steel blades, which favors their springing and
accommodating themselves more readily to the various speeds of the
different parts of the wake. This might be expected to result in some
slight increase of efficiency; of which, however, the writer has never
had the opportunity of satisfactorily determining the exact extent.
Instances can be brought forward where bronze blades have been
substituted for steel or iron with markedly improved results; but in
cases of this kind which the writer has had the opportunity of
analyzing, the whole improvement might be accounted for by the modified
proportions of the screw when in working condition. In other words, both
experiment and practical working alike go to show that, although cast
iron and steel blades as usually proportioned are sufficiently stiff to
retain their form while at work, bronze blades, being made much lighter,
are not; and the result is that the measured or set pitch is less than
that which the blades assume while at work. Some facts relative to this
subject have already been given in a recent paper by the author.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account