Under the alternative circumstances mentioned, half the amount of explosive might practically disable the vessel, though her flotation need not be overcome. Whitehead torpedoes need not necessarily be limited to a depth of 10 ft., as by slightly strengthening their construction they could be run 20 ft. below the surface. We presume it will be allowed that this would increase their destructive power, especially in the vicinity of engines and boilers, which now occupy so much space. In a similar manner there is no difficulty in increasing the charge of a locomotive torpedo to a point at which it becomes irresistible, whatever system of internal protection may be devised. This has, in fact, been going on for some time; more than one nation possesses torpedoes armed with 100 lb. of guncotton, and if we do not, it is simply because former experiments led us to believe sufficient damage would be caused by a less quantity. We can only consider that disproved on demonstration by further trials under conditions less favorable to the ship, and we venture to predict some delusions will then be dispelled which this particular experiment seems to have occasioned. [Illustration: TORPEDO EXPERIMENTS AT PORTSMOUTH--DAMAGE DONE TO THE PORT SIDE OF H.M.S. RESISTANCE.] Steel Wire Brush Patent. Before Judges McKennan and Acheson of the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, at Pittsburg, Pa., No. 16 of November term, 1886, a question arose as to whether a steel wire brush for cleaning castings, and a steel wire brush for cleaning boiler flues, was an infringement on what is generally known as the Wright patent, No. 59,733, and the reissue, No. 2,598, owned by Joseph McArthur, of New York city. The Wright patent consists of a wooden block with a series of pairs of holes. A bundle of wire splints is doubled and the ends inserted in the holes, being held by the wooden bridge between the holes and by a wooden back screwed to the block. Joseph H. Davis, of Sewickley, Pa., the defendant, under his casting brush patent, No. 232,600, the construction of which consists in the doubling of the wire splints and inserting in one hole of a wooden block, and fastening by means of weaving a wire through the loop, the wire being held in place by a wooden back fastened on by driving wrought iron nails through the block and back and clinching on the back, thus making the block and back practically inseparable. The Davis flue brush patent, No. 181,416, is made by sticking the wire splints through holes in an iron cylinder, there being no wood about its construction. Several cases had been tried in other States involving the validity of the Wright patent, which had resulted in Mr. McArthur's favor, but after exhaustive argument in the case at Pittsburg, Pa., the court held the Davis brush not to be an infringement on the Wright patent. How Long Should a Nervous Patient be Treated?