Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth centuryRobertson, Eben William
History
Scotland under her early kings, Volume 1 (of 2) : $b a history of the kingdom to the close of the thirteenth century
Robertson, Eben William
Scotland -- History -- To 1603
The existence of the royal Maor and Mormaor--officials in direct
dependence on the king, and resembling the royal Jarls and Lendermen
amongst the Northmen, or the king’s Ealdorman and Gerefa amongst the
Anglo-Saxons--implies a greater consolidation and compactness in the
Scottish monarchy than was ever attained amongst the kindred Celts of
Ireland or Wales; and it is to the policy pursued during the reigns
of Malcolm and his father Kenneth that this result is probably to be
attributed. The Maor, indeed, was an official familiar to the Gaelic
people long before the era of Kenneth and Malcolm, and he probably
played an important part in the conquered provinces annexed by the
elder Angus and his successors; but the Mormaor--the head of a province
ruling as a royal deputy instead of an independent prince--points to
a revolution in the tenure of land resembling the changes introduced
by Harfager, when he cancelled “_Odal_ right” wherever he could
extend his authority, and levied _land-tax_ by means of his Jarls
and Lendermen; and it was a revolution of this description that may
possibly have been carried out in the course of Malcolm’s reign and
that of his father. Scotland, according to Fordun, was portioned out
in ancient times into Thanages, or Fee-farms paying rent, held of
course of the crown--for any other theory was incompatible with the
ideas of the feudal era--until Malcolm, remitting the rents, gave away
the whole kingdom, only reserving to himself the Moot Hill of Scone,
when in return for the royal prodigality his people confirmed their
sovereign’s right to wardship, relief, and other feudal privileges.
Lurking under this singular statement there are probably some grains
of truth, thoroughly misunderstood by the chronicler; and as in the
partition of Scotland into Thanages a tradition may be recognized of
its ancient division into _Triocha-ceds_ and _Bailes_, or Baronies
and Townlands--institutions of a character inseparable from the very
existence of a _settled_ community--so the reduction of the kingdom of
Scotland as it then existed to a more direct dependence upon the royal
authority, entailing land-tax, _merchet_, and other Celtic mulcts, in
quarters hitherto exempt from such exactions, seems to be shadowed out
under the _feudal_ grant of the whole kingdom and the _feudal_ return
made by the gratitude of the Scottish people. Like Wales and Ireland,
the whole kingdom was probably divided in theory into _Triocha-ceds_,
_Cantreds_, or Thanages, the tribe lands held by chieftains as untaxed
_Duchas_, the crown-lands by Maors or Thanes answerable for the rents
and dues; and if Malcolm, by cancelling “_Duchas_ right” as far as
it lay in his power, assimilated the tenure of the whole kingdom to
that of the royal Maor, or, in other words, taxed the hitherto untaxed
_Duchasach_, he only brought about the same change which Harfager had
already effected in Norway, and which the ministers of the Frank kings
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account