Scripture texts illustrated by general literatureJacox, Francis
Religion
Scripture texts illustrated by general literature
Jacox, Francis
Homiletical illustrations
Byron muses on a skull[10] from among scattered heaps, as now a shattered
cell which even the worm disdains; he ponders on its broken arch, its
ruined wall, its chambers desolate, and portals foul; yet,
... “this was once Ambition’s airy hall,
The dome of Thought, the palace of the Soul:
Behold through each lack-lustre, eyeless hole,
The gay recess of Wisdom and of Wit
And Passion’s host, that never brook’d control.”
It is Yorick’s skull that Hamlet is apostrophizing when he says, “Now
get you to my lady’s chamber, and tell her, let her paint an inch thick,
to _this_ favour she must come.” _Tôt ou tard_, as _le bon réligieux_
in “Atala” reminds his fair young listener, _quelle qu’eût été votre
felicité, ce beau visage se fút changé en cette figure uniforme que le
sépulcre donne à la famille d’Adam_. The good king Réné had painted on
the walls of one of the rooms in the Celestine monastery at Avignon, a
skeleton—it was that of a once surpassing beauty who had won his heart.
How would the moral have lost its point had the head of the skeleton
been replaced, like that in the painter’s room in the Strada Vecchia
of Rome, so graphically described in “Dutch Pictures,” by a mask, or
cardboard “dummy” of a superlatively inane cast of beauty—the blue eyes
and symmetrical lips (curved into an unmeaning and eternal simper),
the pink cheeks, and silken doll’s tresses, “contrasting strangely
with the terribly matter-of-fact bones and ligaments beneath—the moral
to my lady’s looking-glass.” Gwillim, the Pursuivant, as quoted, not
approvingly, in Southey’s “Doctor,” counsels all gentlewomen that are
proud of their beauty to consider that they “carry on their shoulders
nothing but a skull wrapt in skin, which one day will be loathsome to be
looked on.” The old French poet Villon, _aux charniers des Innocents_,
speculates in a manner that to one critic recalls the graveyard scene in
“Hamlet,” on the destiny of _corps féminin, qui tant est tendre, poli,
suave, gracieux_—for how can he help his thoughts running thitherward
“quand il considère ces têtes entassées en ces charniers”? Who, indeed,
as Keats once asked,
“Who hath not loiter’d in a green churchyard,
And let his spirit, like a demon mole,
Work through the clayey soil and gravel hard,
To see skull, coffin’d bones, and funeral stole;
Pitying each form that hungry Death has marr’d,
And filling it once more with human soul?”
In such a spot Blair lingers, to apostrophize beauty, as a pretty
plaything, a dear deceit, which the grave discredits. The charms
expunged, the roses faded, and the lilies soiled, what has beauty more
to boast of? Will the lovers of it flock round it now, to gaze and do it
homage?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account